Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/2298/2001 of TULARAM JAISWAL Vs THE STATE OF C.G.and ORS. on 6 December 2001
GOURT OF CHHATTI$GABH MQT BQASEUR writ ivetition No._,_239?/2oo1 PETITION LR RESPONDENTS : Tularam Jaiswal, S/o Shri Jnodiram Jaiswal, aged a‘baut 1+0 years, R/o Kodma Iviahant $.Q. Dongaria, Lormi, Dis trict- Bilas pur . - Versus — u “4., tate of Chhattis garb ihro ugh:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
m,i‘q/tq/\—:fggk
333TTHE EIGH. GOURTOF CHHATTI$GABH MQT BQASEUR
writ ivetition[No._,_239?/2oo1]
PETI TI ON LR:Tularam Jaiswal,
S/o Shri Jnodiram Jaiswal,ageda‘baut[1+0]years,R/o KodmaIviahant $.Q.Dongaria, Lormi,Dis trict- Bilas pur .
—
- Versus
“4.,(f[1]u:1obtateof Chhattis garb3ihro ugh: Secretary ,Department of Health,D .K.Bnawa.n ,Raipur .
RESPONDEN TS
2. Joint Director,Directorate of HealthServicesGhha ttis garh , Raipur .
3. [Chief][ Medical]and Health
Offic er, Bilaspur.
w?»
wan PETggION§wERAET1CLE[ 226/227]QF[TuE]CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA FOR IS§§MGE OF[.A]wRlTgigTHE MTUHELOF Glagigmm , momBlTioN,Em.AND/OR 3UIE'ABLE_DIREETIONOR ORDE.XJANDAMU$
XE-HC—ZZ
s m[‘1]mammwt’06.12.2001L,Heard Shri Vinny Pandey,[Iéarnfd]Icounsel[for][ the]pefifioner‘.HeardalsoShriRajeevShrivasfava,learned Panel-Lawyer for[The]zmNo.1 / S‘rafe.iresponden'r‘iThe wr'i‘r pe1'i1'ioner'[was][ appo‘ir][ fed as]Dish'ic‘r Leve! Malaria[Worker]TobyChief MedicalOfficerBllaspur[on][ 27 O9][ 1985][ and][ he][ was]postedPrimaryHeal'rhCenfer,Vlllage:LormlWhlle servmg[as][ such,][ by][ anofher]Li'oorderdafed07.09.20011hew1fpefifionerwasTransferred‘The wife of[fhe][ wrif]pe[i‘rioner][ also][ vrorks][ at][ ‘rhe][ same]place.JMahasamund.ifV.Thelearnedcounselforfl'hepfifionersubmitsvfha‘rsincebo‘rhThelhusbandandwife areworkingas D£fric+LevelEmployees,1heymaybe1'os‘raya‘r 1he sameplaceIfis alsosubml'Hedfha‘r normallyiallowedlevelworkerIsnoi' fransfe red+0 anofherdisfric‘i'IfIsalso‘ldis‘rric‘rlifurfher‘hlls'l'afed[‘I’haf]The[ wri‘l']pefmonpr[has no?][ been][ released] dafe andhisLormiplace[a1]]anabody[has][ been][ pos‘l'ed][ In]nShriRaJeevShrivas'ravaha%paintedoutthatsincethewrit3%4M;§petitioneris aState employeethismatter[should]be dealt Withby thej‘State Administrative[Tribunal]This submissmn has forceljIn theresultthis petitionis bisposed of[With][ a][ direction][ that][ the]llwritshallapproachStateAdministrativeTribunalWithintenIpetitionerdays from todayOn receipt of petitionthe learned[Tribunal][ shall]proceed_tttoWe[examine]Mtmuaw.”[ and] m“we“[ dispose][ of]we[ the].e-.v[ same][ww‘vm,][ on]ewmamnu[ merit]w.
’
3r
.J.,JW
,w
wwwm