Gujarat High Court
CRA/1435/1997 of MANJULABEN VASUDEV (SATHWARA) KADIA Vs VASUDEV S SATHWARA - DELETED AS DIED on 18 November 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1435 of 1997 Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1435 of 1997
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- MANJULABEN VASUDEV (SATHWARA) KADIAVersus VASUDEV S SATHWARA - DELETED AS DIED -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR SANDIP C SHAH for Petitioners MR HARIT J BHATT for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
Date of decision: 18/11/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. As a result of the hearing and discussion a consensus has been arrived at on the basis of which it is directed that the Tribunal shall hear and dispose of the Motor Accident Claim Petition No.1726/96 as expeditiously as possible and in any case not later than 30th June
2000.
2. The opponent no.2 herein shall deposit a sum of Rs.50000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) before the Tribunal which shall be invested by the Tribunal in a fixed deposit with a nationalised bank for a short term deposit so that the interest thereon will accumulate. The amount of deposit together with the interest shall be subject to adjustment against the final award which may be passed in the main claim petition.
3. In view of the aforesaid directions no further orders on this revision are necessary and the same is accordingly disposed of. Rule is accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs.
********