Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/77/2000 of AMIN Vs STATE on 8 December 2000
‘ ...... A w.p. __Z;)“‘/2ooo Petitionex- z- Mo. Amp. s/o Late smi Hamid Khan Aged 2! years R/O Kasaridhih Durg Chha‘ttiSgarh VERSUS z u- 1. State of M.P. Tmough — Secretarv Home Department (seeariat Raipu}, C3hattisgarh 2. ,Supei’cendant of Police Dis tto
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
‘XI—HC-22
v
WWJIW m
M‘wy)()lfw
.4 Vk/
C19M/
t
W
“Lima[COURT]OF cmATTIsGARK8-12-2000 .shriT.K.Tiwar,i , learn[ é.]counselforthepetitioner.......shriRan‘veers ingh‘,[l][ earn-ed]Gavt . Audv[.]£orthe saate[ .]Thegrievanceoftheto bepetitioner[appears]that,hisreporto£cognizab[Le]3"offenceisnotbeing[taken]rbytheconcerned‘policeWstationandaccording[to]hiNcomplainant[“s]information .no actionwouldbe ltakenon @dhisbecause thezeport‘accusedispersonalfriend?oftheSoperintendent.ofPolice.FromthepetitionandL§al“mtheavermentsmadeinit,ii7.I._ldrav..‘itdoesnotappearthatthe!ecedpetitionerhastaken4,6,3glstepsasrequired,unerim 1%£i‘ct{wt/k§—.¢~w‘\m‘ca[l/WLf/Jbk]
' mW(W),‘