Gujarat High Court

SCR.A/1544/1997 of BHOLABHAI SANKALBHAI PATEL Vs AMRUT JESANJ RABARI on 19 December 1997

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 1544 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and MR.JUSTICE C.K.BUCH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 1544 of 1997

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and

MR.JUSTICE C.K.BUCH

============================================================

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?

4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?

-------------------------------------------------------------- BHOLABHAI SANKALBHAI PATEL

Versus

AMRUT JESANJ RABARI

-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:

MR KANUBHAI I PATEL for Petitioner

MR NM PATEL for Respondent No. 1

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and ��MR.JUSTICE C.K.BUCH

Date of decision: 19/12/97

ORAL JUDGEMENT

1. Bholabhai Sankalbhai Patel has preferred this application interalia praying for appropriate directions to the respondents to produce Anandiben, daughter of the petitioner.

Page 1 of 2

2. Today, Police has produced the said Anandiben before us. On questioning her, we are told that she is about 26 years old and she is a B.A. Graduate. We are also told that at present she is studying Home Science in B.E.D. College, Manekchowk and she is also serving as a Teacher in Kailash School.

3. On questioning, the said Anandiben has informed us that she is not willing to go to her parents house and she has shown her willingness to go with Amrut Jesanj Rabari, with whom, according to her, she has married. She has further stated that she is not wrongfully confined by the said Amrut.

4. In the circumstances, we do not find any reason to entertain this petition any further. Anandiben is at liberty to go wherever she likes. It is directed that it being a matrimonial matter, no publicity in whatsoever manner will be given by either side.

5. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. Notice is discharged. csm./���--------------

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead