Gujarat High Court

SCA/5120/1996 of MEENABEN MUKESHKUMAR MODI W/O DETENUE MUKESHBHAI Vs COMMISSIONER OF POLICE on 6 November 1996

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5120 of 1996 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5120 of 1996

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA Sd/-

============================================================

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?

4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?

Nos. 1 to 5 No.

-------------------------------------------------------------- MEENABEN MUKESHKUMAR MODI W/O DETENUE MUKESHBHAI

Versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR NM KAPADIA for Petitioner MR.NEEGAM SHUKLA,AGP for Respondents.

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA Date of decision: 06/11/96

ORAL JUDGEMENT

This Special Civil Application filed by the wife of the detenu is directed against the order dated 14.6.1996 passed by the Police Commissioner,Surat City whereby the detenuhas been detained under the provisions of Gujarat Prevention of Antisocial Activities Act, 1985. The detention order was executed on 15.6.1996 and since then the detenu is under detention lodged at District Jail, Rajkot.

This Special Civil Application was filed on 15.7.1996 and 16.7.1996 Rule returnable for 26.8.1996 was issued. but so far neither any reply has been filed nor any affidavit of the Detaining Authority has been filed. The grounds of detention enclosed with the detention order show that three criminal cases under Bombay Prohibition Act were registered against the detenu. Besides this the Detaining Authority has taken into consideration the statements made by certain witnesses against the petitioner's antisocial activities with regard to the incident dated 10.1.1996 and 26.2.1996. The detenu is found to be engaged in antisocial activities and has been detained as bootlegger. The detention order has been challenged on more than one grounds but the learned counsel for the bootlegger. The detention order has been challenged on more than one grounds but the learned counsel for the petitioner has stress that no case of breach of public order is made out.

In viesw of the reasons given in Special Civil Application No.3879 of 1996 dated 4.10.1996, it is clear that the allegation and material relied upon by the Detaining Authority against the detenu do not constitute a case of breach of public order. It is at the most a case of law and order and therefore the detention order deserves to be quashed and set aside on this ground alone.

Accordingly this Special Civil Application is allowed. The impugned detention order dated 14.6.1996 passed by the Police Commissioner, Surat City is hereby quashed and set aside and the detention order against the detenu is declared to be illegal. The respondents are directed to release the detenu Mukeshbhai Prabhudas Champaklal Modi and set him at liberty forthwith if not required in any other case. Rule is made absolute. Learned counsel for the detenu submitted that during the pendency of the petition the detenu has been transferred to Central Prison, Sabarmati. Writ may be issued accordingly.

���-------

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead