Gujarat High Court

SCA/11199/1993 of THAKER VASUDEV SHIVSHANKER SINCE DECD.THRO HIS LEGAL HEIR Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 21 December 2002

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 11199 of 1993 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 11199 of 1993

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD

============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO

of the judgement?

4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO

of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals?

-------------------------------------------------------------- THAKER VASUDEV SHIVSHANKER

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS

-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Special Civil Application No. 11199 of 1993

Ms. Urvi Vora for Mr. Pranav G. Desai (MR GN DESAI) for Petitioner No. 1-2/1 Mr. H.C. Patel, AGP for Respondent No. 1

MR PJ VYAS for Respondent No. 2-3

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD

Date of decision: 21/12/2002

ORAL JUDGEMENT

Learned advocate Ms. Urvi Desai appearing for Mr. Pranav Desai, learned advocate for the petitioner has produced withdrawal purshis with signature of the petitioner wherein it has been mentioned that there is a settlement between the parties out side the court and as a result thereof, it has been decided to withdraw the present petition. The prayer for withdrawal of this petition has not been objected by Mr. H.C. Patel, learned AGP and Mr. P.J. Vyas, learned advocate appearing for the respondents. Accordingly, present petition is required to be withdrawn.

In view of these facts, leave to withdraw this petition is granted. This petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Ad-interim relief, if any, shall stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Dt. 21.12.2002. ���(H.K. Rathod,J.)

Vyas

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead