WP/25/2000 of VEER BHAN JINDAL Vs THE STATE OF C.G. on 14 December 2000

TfEHIGH COURT QFJUDECATURE AT BILASPUR (CHEATTISHARM

WRITPETITION NO}OF2000 \

BEE’IWEEN

Veerbhan Jindal Sono£lateshri Mahan Chand Jindal,agedabout50years,residentofrPlot No.12,IndraVyavaai(Conmercial)knd residential Centre,TransportNagar Korba Chlgattisgarh.

’7’1Ma

PETI[’I'I]ONER

AND

Thestateéf.Cbhattisgarh,Throughthe Director,Eagariya[Prashesan]and VikasV,RATLPUR(CWTTISGARH)

TheComnissiener,Municipal Corporation

V

,Korba.£

Estate O££icer(sampada Adhikari)Hagar[Palika][ Nigam,‘][ Korba]

(sampada Adhikari)

,

(SADA KOREA)

o

ChiefExecutive Officer,Nagar Palika,Korba ,Korba a RESPONDENTSi/CYRI'I‘PETITION UNDER ARTICLES2261 227OFTEECONSTITUTIONOI‘[‘]INDIA'(is L

mm (W)

l\a_spur

Chhattisgérh , ‘Bi

’

—~y/v'

’ W 200

m

mamas: (W)

‘ mmméi’a‘Emm.’.2’J.‘depositedasumofRs.5Q,4"000/-.However,heraised(area’propo‘sed'pleaathattohimatRs'.200/— persquarefootbenowallotedatRs.100/— pep‘square‘§footorhismoneybereundedbacktohim.ThKirespondent-:5 :acceptingt eeermso£theletter. can—’Byynocelledtheallotment‘anrefundedthe menéy;I,s'tretchof,iméginaticn,itcanbesaidthattheres-pondentstriedtooppresthe petitionerortook,undteadvantageoftheituationaWhenofferwas.made @ Rs.200/—persqu re£octand the petitioner’wasnotagreabletothesame,ho concludedcontractever caneintoexistenc.‘If/inabsence o£a‘concludedcontractevena' decreeorspecific performanccannotbe gaantedbyaCivilcurt,itwould notbe‘forthe High Court toit effereunderArticle226ofthe ConstitutionofInda.The petition.idismis‘sgd‘:,Kt-sdl-‘v,R.S.GargJudgeyiGRPRJ‘:—~FSI242——2/2000—‘30.000.