Gujarat High Court
SCA/245/1997 of GSRTC Vs KIRIT SINH R GOHIL on 9 December 1997
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 245 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.L.GOKHALE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 245 of 1997
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.L.GOKHALE
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- GSRTCVersus KIRIT SINH R GOHIL -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MRS VASAVDATTA BHATT for Petitioner MR TR MISHRA for Respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE H.L.GOKHALE Date of decision: 09/12/97
ORAL JUDGEMENT Heard Mrs.Bhatt for the petitioner and Mr. Mishra for the respondent. Rule had already been issued on this petition on 4/4/1997, making it returnable on 22/4/1997 by my brother Calla J. When the matter was placed before this court today, it is pointed out by Ms. Bhatt that the petitioners do not have any serious objection to the impugned order, but proper placement to the respondent may be given. He has represented to the petitioner after the impugned award. The petitioner have recorded by the letter to their Advocate Mrs. Bhatt that they are agreeable to place the respondent in the post of Helper by protecting his last pay as stated in their letter. The petitioner will issue the necessary order of resumption on duty by the end of December, 1997 and other consequential monetary benefits will be cleared to him by the end of January, 1998. This petition is accordingly disposed of. Rule is made absolute to the extent aforesaid, with no order as to costs. Direct Service is permitted to the respondent.
����------
(ccs)