Chhattisgarh High Court

WRIT PETITION 8805 of 2025 on 4 January 1997

2025:CGHC:42732

2025:CGHC:42732

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPS No. 8805 of 2025

1 - Nileshwari Premi W/o Late Shri Devnarayan Premi Aged About 35 YearsOccupation Service, Presently Posted And Working As Constable (M), SpecialBranch, Police Headquarters, Raipur District Raipur C.G.

2 - Nitish Rawate S/o Late Shri Kamal Kant Rawate Aged About 25 YearsOccupation Service, Presently Posted As Constable (M), Police Headquarters,Special Branch, Raipur District Raipur C.G.

3 - Sangita Devi W/o Late Shri Ajay Kumar Aged About 39 Years OccupationService, Presently Posted As Constable (M), Police Headquarters, Special Branch,Raipur District Raipur C.G.

... Petitioners

versus

1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, MahanadiBhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur C.G.

2 - Director General of Police, Police Head Quarters, Atal Nagar, Nawa RaipurDistrict Raipur C.G.

3 - Additional Director General of Police (Intelligence), Raipur District Raipur C.G.

4 - Superintendent of Police, Raipur District Raipur C.G.

... Respondent

(Cause title taken from Case Information System)

For Petitioners:Mr. Sourabh Sahu, Advocate. For Respondents/State:Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 22-08-2025

Page 1 of 3

1. The petitioners have filed the present writ petition claiming the followingrelief(s):-relief(s):- “i.That, The Hon’ble Court may be pleased to call the entirerecords pertaining the case of petitioner for its kind perusal.records pertaining the case of petitioner for its kind perusal.

ii.The Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to direct therespondent authorities for the consideration of case of thepetitioners for promotion to the post of Assist Sub Inspector (M)in the light of letter dated 23/06/1995, 04/01/1997 and the SOPdated 12/10/2006.respondent authorities for the consideration of case of thepetitioners for promotion to the post of Assist Sub Inspector (M)in the light of letter dated 23/06/1995, 04/01/1997 and the SOPdated 12/10/2006.

iii.Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper,may also kindly be granted to the petitioners, in the interest ofjustice.may also kindly be granted to the petitioners, in the interest ofjustice.

iv.Cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioners.”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners havebeen appointed on compassionate ground vide orders dated 22-11-2017, 17-10-2017 and 15-06-2016 respectively. The petitioners have completed morethan 5 years of their service as Constable (M). There is circular of StateGovernment dated 23-06-1995, 04-01-1997 and SOP dated 12-10-2006 andin view of those circulars the petitioners are also entitled for promotion on thepost of Assistant Sub Inspector (M) in the department after successfullycompletion of five years of service. The other similarly situated employeeshave been given promotion on the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (M).However, despite fulfilling the criteria, the petitioners have not been givenpromotion on the said post. He would further submit that petitioner No. 1 hasmade her representation on 14-09-2023 and 30-07-2024 (Annexure-P/5), butbeen appointed on compassionate ground vide orders dated 22-11-2017, 17-10-2017 and 15-06-2016 respectively. The petitioners have completed morethan 5 years of their service as Constable (M). There is circular of StateGovernment dated 23-06-1995, 04-01-1997 and SOP dated 12-10-2006 andin view of those circulars the petitioners are also entitled for promotion on thepost of Assistant Sub Inspector (M) in the department after successfullycompletion of five years of service. The other similarly situated employeeshave been given promotion on the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (M).However, despite fulfilling the criteria, the petitioners have not been givenpromotion on the said post. He would further submit that petitioner No. 1 hasmade her representation on 14-09-2023 and 30-07-2024 (Annexure-P/5), but till date her representation has not been considered. It is further submittedthat petitioners No.2 and 3 may also be permitted to make theirrepresentation before the authority and respondent No.3 may be directed toconsider the representation of the petitioners and to pass appropriate orderin accordance with law and as per applicable rules and circulars of the department holding the field within a stipulated time-frame.

Page 2 of 3

3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State has no objection if suchdirection is made to the respondent No.3 to take a decision on therepresentation of the petitioners in accordance with law.direction is made to the respondent No.3 to take a decision on therepresentation of the petitioners in accordance with law.

4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, thepresent writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioners to make freshrepresentation before respondent No.3 and in the eventuality of making suchrepresentation by the petitioners, respondent No.3 is directed to take adecision on the representation of the petitioners keeping in view these threecirculars dated 23-06-1995, 04-01-1997 and SOP dated 12-10-2006 inaccordance with law and also under the applicable rules and circulars of thedepartment holding the field within 90 days from the date of receipt of copy ofthis order.present writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioners to make freshrepresentation before respondent No.3 and in the eventuality of making suchrepresentation by the petitioners, respondent No.3 is directed to take adecision on the representation of the petitioners keeping in view these threecirculars dated 23-06-1995, 04-01-1997 and SOP dated 12-10-2006 inaccordance with law and also under the applicable rules and circulars of thedepartment holding the field within 90 days from the date of receipt of copy ofthis order.

5. The petitioners are directed to produce a copy of this order to respondentNo.3 within two weeks from today.No.3 within two weeks from today.

6. With the aforesaid observation the present writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)Judge

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead