Gujarat High Court
SCA/3015/1988 of ISHWARBHAI TAPUBHAIM ZALA Vs PETLAD NAGRIK SAHKARI BANK LTD on 27 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3015 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3015 of 1988
For Approval and Signature:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals?
-------------------------------------------------------------- ISHWARBHAI TAPUBHAIM ZALA
Versus
PETLAD NAGRIK SAHKARI BANK LTD
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. Special Civil Application No. 3015 of 1988 MR SHIRISH JOSHI for Petitioner No. 1-3
MR RA PATEL for Respondent No. 1
MR LB DABHI A.G.P. for Respondent No. 2,4 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 3,5-7,9-10
RULE NOT RECD BACK for Respondent No. 8
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI
Date of decision: 27/12/2004
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Mr. Shirish Joshi learned advocate for the petitioners has submitted that the said bank has been deregistered and, therefore, the petition has become infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid statement, the
petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous.
Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Interim relief if any, stands vacated.
����[K.S. JHAVERI, J.]
/phalguni/