Chhattisgarh High Court

WP/3292/2003 of SHIV CHARAN PATEL Vs THE STATE OF C.G.and ORS. on 5 December 2003

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W.P. N0$2920f 2003 / SHIVCHARAN PATEL, SON OF LATE RAGHUNATH PATEL, f AGED 53 YEARS, RESIDENT OF MAHALPARA, SARAIPALI, DISTT. MAHASAMUND. ?§’”ETITIONER VERSUS 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINSTRYI OF SCHOOL

IN THE HIHG COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPURW.P. N0$2920f 2003/

SHIVCHARANPATEL,SONOFLATERAGHUNATHPATEL, f LATERAGHUNATHAGED 53 YEARS, RESIDENT OFMAHALPARA,SARAIPALI, DISTT. MAHASAMUND.

?§’”ETITIONER

VERSUS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. STATEOFCHHATTISGARH,THROUGH THE SECRETARY,MINSTRYIOFSCHOOLEDUCATION,D.K.S.BHAWAN, RAIPUR.2.THEDISTRICTEDUCATIONOFFICER, MAHASAMUND.

RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES226 AND227'OFOFTHECONSTITUTIONINDIAFORTHE\OF's\gg‘g‘[ISSUANCE]OFWRITSINTHENATUREMANDAMUS,CERTIORARIAND/ORORDER(S),AND/ORDIRECTION(S)’INTHENATUREOFWRITS

The humble petition ofthe Petitioner above named:

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH

(1) PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER:

XI-HC-22,

U

WWmW

3a W, m, mm;

@

am mmimngzagéiwia

m

WW wWWWW$armm-Learnecic0u11se1fof the#aiticnez‘submitsthattkmIpetitionermay136allowedtQmakearepresentatiantoRasspondent No.1 am}. the Resp11d€nt No. 1 may be dirsétedto d€cidc the same, far which[16]i16<i Govt. Aavacate has noobjecticm.E“Havmg heard the Immed(201211561 for 1:116 parties wldhaving regard to the facts and[ C'][‘cumstancee][ Gf][ the][ caee,][ the]petitioner[is][ aHGWed]to make1‘ pi‘esentatien to RespondentNo.1, mieing all hisgrievanceWithin a period of 10 daye{Tom tcxiay and.£31 turn the. Resondeut No.1 will decide thereplesentaiion of ihe petitionerneidering all hie grievancesWithin another period of[30][ day]from the date of receipt ofthe representation by passing[a]asoned order.if the petitioner is not ah[ady][ reiieved,][ he][ should][ not]‘oe/relievedtilltherepresentionisdecidedr bytheRespondent No. 1.Withthealloveobservati ns thisoetitionisdecidedfinally.The parties are entitled[for][ certified][ copy][ of][ this][ Older.]Sdl-L_C.BHM309,JudgelII\.

WeW

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead