Chhattisgarh High Court
WPCR/657/2020 of SUKBAR SIDAR Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 24 December 2020
AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 657 of 2020 • Sukbar Sidar S/o Ghasia Sidar Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Bonda, P.S. And Tahsil Pusaur, Distt. Raigarh, Civil And Revenue Distt. Raigarh, Civil And Revenue Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh Petitioner Versus 1. State
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPCR No. 657 of 2020
Sukbar Sidar S/o Ghasia Sidar Aged About 56 Years R/oVillage- Bonda, P.S. And Tahsil - Pusaur, Distt.Raigarh, Civil And Revenue Distt. Raigarh, Civil AndRevenue Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh Village- Bonda, P.S. And Tahsil - Pusaur, Distt.Raigarh, Civil And Revenue Distt. Raigarh, Civil AndRevenue Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, DepartmentOf Home Affairs And Police, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhavan,Atal Nagar, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh)Of Home Affairs And Police, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhavan,Atal Nagar, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
2. The District Magistrate Raigarh Distt. Raigarh(Chhattisgarh)(Chhattisgarh)
3. The Superintendant Of Police Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh(Chhattisgarh)(Chhattisgarh)
4. The Tahsildar Pusaur, Distt. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh), 5.The Superintendent Of Central Jail Bilaspur Distt.Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)5.The Superintendent Of Central Jail Bilaspur Distt.Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
--- Respondents
For Petitioner :-Mr. M.K. Sinha, AdvocateFor State :-Ms. Veena Nair, Dy. G.A.
24/12/2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuOrder on Board
1. The petitioner has filed this writ petitionpleading therein that they have already moved anapplication for extension of parole period but theauthorities have not decided their applicationstill date.pleading therein that they have already moved anapplication for extension of parole period but theauthorities have not decided their applicationstill date.
Page 1 of 2
2. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that thepetitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writpetition with liberty to approach the competentauthority by way of filing a reminder applicationpetitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writpetition with liberty to approach the competentauthority by way of filing a reminder application and a direction may be issued for considering his application at the earliest.
3. The prayer made by learned counsel for thepetitioner is allowed.petitioner is allowed.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn. However, if any reminder application isfiled by the petitioner that may be considered atthe earliest.withdrawn. However, if any reminder application isfiled by the petitioner that may be considered atthe earliest.
5. Certified copy today.
Sd/-
(Parth Prateem Sahu) Vacation Judge
Vijay Sahu
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…