Gujarat High Court
SCR.A/941/2002 of ZULFIKAR ALIAS IRI, SALLIMUDINRAJPUT Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 27 December 2002
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 941 of 2002 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.P.BUCH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 941 of 2002
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.P.BUCH
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals?
-------------------------------------------------------------- ZULFIKAR ALIAS IRI, SALLIMUDINRAJPUT
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. Special Criminal Application No. 941 of 2002
MR YF MEHTA for Petitioner No. 1 Mr A D Oza, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent No. 1 NOTICE NOT RECD BACK for Respondent No. 2-3
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE D.P.BUCH
Date of decision: 27/12/2002
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Rule. Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr A
By consent of the parties, the petition is being heard and disposed of finally.
2. It seems that the concerned learned Magistrate of the Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Ahmedabad has received certain reports from the police station. He has also received last report from the Assistant Commissioner of 'H' Division Police Station, Ahmedabad City. Naturally, before finally disposing of the matter and before taking a final decision in the matter, the learned Magistrate is required to consider all those reports in proper perspectives. Therefore, the learned Magistrate is directed to consider all the reports received by him pursuant to his order passed below Exh.3 at Annexure 'B' at page 16 dated 28.8.2002. The learned Magistrate shall decide and dispose of the matter accordingly after considering those reports and after hearing the petitioners. With this direction, the petition is ordered to be disposed of. In the meantime, it is directed that till the final decision in the said matter, the petitioner herein shall not be arrested by the concerned Investigating Officer in the offence in respect of which the present petition has been filed. Rule is made absolute. D.S. permitted.
27.12.2002���[D P Buch, J.]
msp