Gujarat High Court

SCA/363/1991 of GUJARAT CO.OP.OILSEEDS GROWERSFEDERATION LTD. Vs UNION OF INDIA on 18 December 1997

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 363 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 363 of 1991

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA Sd/-

============================================================

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?

4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?

Nos. 1 to 5 No

-------------------------------------------------------------- GUJARAT CO.OP.OILSEEDS GROWERSFEDERATION LTD.

Versus

UNION OF INDIA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:

NO ONE APPEARS FOR THE PARTIES.

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA Date of decision: 18/12/97

ORAL JUDGEMENT

Page 1 of 2

No one appears for the parties even in the second round and even after the break in the second sitting. This petition appears to have been filed against the notice Annexure "A" issued by the Chief Accounts Officer (North) Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited, New Delhi for the settlement of outstanding dues against the closed telephone number used by Gujarat Co-operative Oilseeds Growers Federation Ltd.,Narayan Chambers, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad. The ordersheet dated 28.7.1992 shows that the interim relief was continued on the condition that the amount mentioned in Annexure "A" is deposited with the respondent authorities within two weeks failing which interim relief will stand automatically vacated. It is further recorded that admittedly the petitioner had been using the disputed telephone eventhough it was registered in the name of some one else and in view of the admitted use of the disputed telephone the petitioner was directed to deposit the amount mentioned in Annexure "A".

It appears that this order with regard to the deposit of the amount must have been complied with and the parties have lost interest in this litigation and therefore, no one has cared to appear. In the facts and circumstances of the case since the parties are not appearing and they have lost interest in this matter, this Special Civil Application is hereby dismissed. Ad-interim order stands automatically vacated. Rule is hereby discharged.

���----

m.m.bhatt

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead