SCA/8748/1993 of BADRIPRASAD LAL ORAM Vs AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION on 20 December 2001

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8748 of 1993

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH

============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO

-------------------------------------------------------------- BADRIPRASAD LAL ORAMVersus AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:

MR KS ACHARYA for Petitioner.

MR MR ANAND for Respondent WITH MR DC RAWAL.

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH

Date of decision: 20/12/2001

ORAL JUDGEMENT

This petition has been filed for a direction to the respondent to make payment of amounts of provident fund, gratuity and pension and due privilege leave without any delay and/or condition and also for further direction to the respondent to treat the petitioner equally with other employees and sale the quarter to the petitioner as is done in the case of other similarly situated employees of Ahmedabad Municipal Transport Service and to direct the respondent to charge only equally with other employees and sale the quarter to the petitioner as is done in the case of other similarly situated employees of Ahmedabad Municipal Transport Service and to direct the respondent to charge only Rs.150/- p.m. as done while the petitioner was in service.

2. The respondent has filed affidavit-in-reply wherein in para 4 thereof it is stated that the respondent Corporation has paid Rs.13,762-60 towards leave encashment on 4-11-1993, Rs. 35,405-77 towards G.T.S. amount on 14-12-1993 and G.T.S. amount of Rs.811-00 on 21--5-1994 and pension of Rs.10,758-00 from 1-6-1993 to 30-4-1994 and the wife of the petitioner is also getting family pension.

3. As the petitioner has already been made payments of retiral benefits as stated above, this petition does not survive and accordingly this petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged, with no order as to costs.

���-0-0-0-0-0-

/JVSatwara/