Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/897/2004 of SRIPATI SINGH Vs THE STATE OF C.G.and ORS. on 24 December 2004
COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR Wnt Petition No.^o)7/2004 PETmONER :.../ A *-'< ..••' A ^-~ ..^•M/y.•••">%::" p*<^..<--y^. .' %^ Sdpati Sngh- S/o Late NayanSingt^ Aged atoui 56 year&^ R/o Belwatikar, Daltongunj, Disttict ~ Palan^
^l
IN TIiE HIGH COURT OFCHHATHSGARH AT BILASPURWnt Petition No.^o)7/2004PETmONER :.../A*-'<Sdpati Sngh-..••'A^-~S/o Late NayanSingt^..^•M/Aged atoui 56 year&^.•••">%::"R/o Belwatikar, Daltongunj,p*<^yDisttict ~ Palan^ JliaiMiatidL..<--y^. .'Vemii&-%^1.%ate of Qihattisgarfi, tihroug^iSecretary, Departaient of Horr^/Mantralaya,, Stiastd Chowl^RaipUT(CG-).2.SqpNarinteiident of Police.Baaspur(CGL)3.Shri Abdul Rashid,S/o Shri Abdul Hafij,Aged about 51 yeors/Proprietor M/s A R TradmgCotiyatiy/ neat' CMD. Cotlege,LirikRoad, Bilaspta'(CG.)WRITPETITIONUNDERARTICLE226OFTHECONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IWTHENATURBOFMANDAMUS.PROHIBITION.CERTIORARIETC.ORANYOTHERDIRECTIONORQRD^R_TQ_DO JUSTICE[ IN][ THE][ MATTER.]
Page 1 of 3
'S^f '^it^iKn^, y>Tii'<-i<t<?, [sldiy^
*IWCTI »)^l<sh"""""""""""~"""""""""""""""^200^^^.89.ll.?>.<i, ^T^T[Tra^F?](<i?I^^)
W??^ll^l'^1 3i?^T ^fe ^RN?>I^TW ^rft<T ^T^?T^F5fepfl';T'^3J{OT3il^T[^P-^if] ^ f^^l<f^t^i<'24.12.2004Oil a mention beiamade, the niatter is taken up forhearing,Shri Prashaiit Jaiswa],[counsel][ for][ tlie]petitioner,Sint. Fduzia Mirza, Pajnel Law^7er for the State.The petitioner has rjioved fhis writ petition uncler Article226/ 227of tlieConstit^jtionof ludia withfheprayer[that]respondent No/r &2 be]directed to arrcst rcspondent No.3/prodiice[hiin][ before][ the]<|pourt[of][ C.J.M.,]Dalfaiigunj/ Palamu(Jharkhaiid),[declare][ him][ a^]abscoadiag aad attach his property.Brief facts leadiag Ijo filing of fhis petition are fhat tliepetitioner[herem][ filed][ a][ Coi^iplamt][ Case][ No.][ 17/][ 01][ before][ tlie][ Chief]JudicialMagistrate,Da|tangunj;Palaniu(JIiarkhaad)forcoBimission of offence zindjer Sections 419, 420 & 406 of IndiaaPenal Code agamst respon<|ent No,3 hereia.It appears that basedon that coniplahit leaniedMagistrate took tih.e cognizaiice of fheaforesaid offences agaiast ijespondent No.3 aad sunimoned hiin toappear before the said coiir|: on 15,1,2001, However, on 16,2.2001on the request of the COBIJ^laiaaiit / petitk)ner[herein][ warrant][ of]arrest was directed to be is|iued to produce respondent No.3 beforeth.e said court on 5,3.2001and vide order dated 20.2.2002 itwasordered tliat tiie niatter bs fixed on 12.3.2002 fororder underSections 82 & 83 of Cr.P.C.IIt appears that in tl^e meaiitime, respondeut herein raovedanticipatory bail before tb.^Court of Sessions Judge, Daltongunj,Palamzi, but the same ha^been rejected by the said court .yide_
Page 2 of 3
^sf ^i^Kn^, ^Til^^i^,['f^TTRy]
•^200
*<1*ICTI ^HT^
^li^T '??^5l ('^^f^1^)
XI-HC—78
^sf ^i^Kn^, ^Til^^i^,['f^TTRy]
•^200
*<1*ICTI ^HT^
^li^T '??^5l ('^^f^1^)
^^'^T'ftFri^^i^i<vi<fl1i ^iw^ff'^'fex^ i[^^s<^"^w^f^r^^i'^T^siSR^I^?W? 3?T^T^Tqworder dated 7.9.2001.B^mgdissatisfied wifh fhe said order,rcspondent No,3 moved an|ticii|ticipatory bail before the High Coiirt ofJharkhand at Ranchi aadjvide orderdated 10.10.2001 ttie HighCourt of Jharkhaad direcNdrespondent No.3 to surrender beforethe court below,.^-As bom-out from1phierecords,theC,J,M.,Daltongunj,Palainu sent a coisiinun^|ition (Amiexure P-4) addressed to fheOfficer In-charge, BUaspui'l(C.G.) fhat a non-bailable warraiit ofarrest aiid process under$ections 82 & 83 of Cr.P.C. be issiiedagaiast respondent No.3aiidfurfher directed tlie Officer In-chargefhat process zinder Sectioi|LS82 & 83 of Cr.P.C. be executed asearly as possible.I have heard learaddcoiuisel for fhe petitiorier on thequestion ofadinission.It has not beenmentjioned ia fhis; petitton that to whoin thewarrao.tof arrest was^aadedover.InthefirstirLstance,^coianiunication (Annexiirey-4) is not eorrectly addressed either toStation House Officer, Pollcj^ Statk)n where respondent No,3 hereiiiis residiiig or to the Distr^ctSuperintendent of Potfce, Bilaspur.Moreover, Annexiire P-4 is|iot in accordance withi the provisions ofSections 82 & 83 of Cr. P. C. |As per provisions of|ections 82 ofCr.P.C., 'ifdny Couttfzasreason io believe that any p\^rsonagainstwhom a warranthas beenissued by U has absconde^or is concealing himself so that suchzvairant cannot be execu^^d,[such][ Court][ may]publisH[a][ wriUen]vroclamniwn recfuirina hzmUo apDear at a specified Dlace_andW a
^^ ~;:3TFT^T^ ^Tl1<4^
<wmi%s*ii^
^I^T[1(7^T]('^3^^)
'3^[ ^jq|<rj|q, ^Tll^}^ M<rlH^<
WH^I ?bNi<^
^?r[XR^F](^3^1)
.;,[GRPRJ—FS/35&—12/2000—50,000.]
^
^s"
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…