Chhattisgarh High Court

WP/897/2004 of SRIPATI SINGH Vs THE STATE OF C.G.and ORS. on 24 December 2004

COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR Wnt Petition No.^o)7/2004 PETmONER :.../ A *-'< ..••' A ^-~ ..^•M/y.•••">%::" p*<^..<--y^. .' %^ Sdpati Sngh- S/o Late NayanSingt^ Aged atoui 56 year&^ R/o Belwatikar, Daltongunj, Disttict ~ Palan^

^l

IN TIiE HIGH COURT OFCHHATHSGARH AT BILASPURWnt Petition No.^o)7/2004PETmONER :.../A*-'<Sdpati Sngh-..••'A^-~S/o Late NayanSingt^..^•M/Aged atoui 56 year&^.•••">%::"R/o Belwatikar, Daltongunj,p*<^yDisttict ~ Palan^ JliaiMiatidL..<--y^. .'Vemii&-%^1.%ate of Qihattisgarfi, tihroug^iSecretary, Departaient of Horr^/Mantralaya,, Stiastd Chowl^RaipUT(CG-).2.SqpNarinteiident of Police.Baaspur(CGL)3.Shri Abdul Rashid,S/o Shri Abdul Hafij,Aged about 51 yeors/Proprietor M/s A R TradmgCotiyatiy/ neat' CMD. Cotlege,LirikRoad, Bilaspta'(CG.)WRITPETITIONUNDERARTICLE226OFTHECONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IWTHENATURBOFMANDAMUS.PROHIBITION.CERTIORARIETC.ORANYOTHERDIRECTIONORQRD^R_TQ_DO JUSTICE[ IN][ THE][ MATTER.]

Page 1 of 3

'S^f '^it^iKn^, y>Tii'<-i<t<?, [sldiy^

*IWCTI »)^l<sh"""""""""""~"""""""""""""""^200^^^.89.ll.?>.<i, ^T^T[Tra^F?](<i?I^^)

W??^ll^l'^1 3i?^T ^fe ^RN?>I^TW ^rft<T ^T^?T^F5fepfl';T'^3J{OT3il^T[^P-^if] ^ f^^l<f^t^i<'24.12.2004Oil a mention beiamade, the niatter is taken up forhearing,Shri Prashaiit Jaiswa],[counsel][ for][ tlie]petitioner,Sint. Fduzia Mirza, Pajnel Law^7er for the State.The petitioner has rjioved fhis writ petition uncler Article226/ 227of tlieConstit^jtionof ludia withfheprayer[that]respondent No/r &2 be]directed to arrcst rcspondent No.3/prodiice[hiin][ before][ the]<|pourt[of][ C.J.M.,]Dalfaiigunj/ Palamu(Jharkhaiid),[declare][ him][ a^]abscoadiag aad attach his property.Brief facts leadiag Ijo filing of fhis petition are fhat tliepetitioner[herem][ filed][ a][ Coi^iplamt][ Case][ No.][ 17/][ 01][ before][ tlie][ Chief]JudicialMagistrate,Da|tangunj;Palaniu(JIiarkhaad)forcoBimission of offence zindjer Sections 419, 420 & 406 of IndiaaPenal Code agamst respon<|ent No,3 hereia.It appears that basedon that coniplahit leaniedMagistrate took tih.e cognizaiice of fheaforesaid offences agaiast ijespondent No.3 aad sunimoned hiin toappear before the said coiir|: on 15,1,2001, However, on 16,2.2001on the request of the COBIJ^laiaaiit / petitk)ner[herein][ warrant][ of]arrest was directed to be is|iued to produce respondent No.3 beforeth.e said court on 5,3.2001and vide order dated 20.2.2002 itwasordered tliat tiie niatter bs fixed on 12.3.2002 fororder underSections 82 & 83 of Cr.P.C.IIt appears that in tl^e meaiitime, respondeut herein raovedanticipatory bail before tb.^Court of Sessions Judge, Daltongunj,Palamzi, but the same ha^been rejected by the said court .yide_

Page 2 of 3

^sf ^i^Kn^, ^Til^^i^,['f^TTRy]

•^200

*<1*ICTI ^HT^

^li^T '??^5l ('^^f^1^)

XI-HC—78

^sf ^i^Kn^, ^Til^^i^,['f^TTRy]

•^200

*<1*ICTI ^HT^

^li^T '??^5l ('^^f^1^)

^^'^T'ftFri^^i^i<vi<fl1i ^iw^ff'^'fex^ i[^^s<^"^w^f^r^^i'^T^siSR^I^?W? 3?T^T^Tqworder dated 7.9.2001.B^mgdissatisfied wifh fhe said order,rcspondent No,3 moved an|ticii|ticipatory bail before the High Coiirt ofJharkhand at Ranchi aadjvide orderdated 10.10.2001 ttie HighCourt of Jharkhaad direcNdrespondent No.3 to surrender beforethe court below,.^-As bom-out from1phierecords,theC,J,M.,Daltongunj,Palainu sent a coisiinun^|ition (Amiexure P-4) addressed to fheOfficer In-charge, BUaspui'l(C.G.) fhat a non-bailable warraiit ofarrest aiid process under$ections 82 & 83 of Cr.P.C. be issiiedagaiast respondent No.3aiidfurfher directed tlie Officer In-chargefhat process zinder Sectioi|LS82 & 83 of Cr.P.C. be executed asearly as possible.I have heard learaddcoiuisel for fhe petitiorier on thequestion ofadinission.It has not beenmentjioned ia fhis; petitton that to whoin thewarrao.tof arrest was^aadedover.InthefirstirLstance,^coianiunication (Annexiirey-4) is not eorrectly addressed either toStation House Officer, Pollcj^ Statk)n where respondent No,3 hereiiiis residiiig or to the Distr^ctSuperintendent of Potfce, Bilaspur.Moreover, Annexiire P-4 is|iot in accordance withi the provisions ofSections 82 & 83 of Cr. P. C. |As per provisions of|ections 82 ofCr.P.C., 'ifdny Couttfzasreason io believe that any p\^rsonagainstwhom a warranthas beenissued by U has absconde^or is concealing himself so that suchzvairant cannot be execu^^d,[such][ Court][ may]publisH[a][ wriUen]vroclamniwn recfuirina hzmUo apDear at a specified Dlace_andW a

^^ ~;:3TFT^T^ ^Tl1<4^

<wmi%s*ii^

^I^T[1(7^T]('^3^^)

'3^[ ^jq|<rj|q, ^Tll^}^ M<rlH^<

WH^I ?bNi<^

^?r[XR^F](^3^1)

.;,[GRPRJ—FS/35&—12/2000—50,000.]

^

^s"

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead