Gujarat High Court
LPA/43/1998 of STATE OF GUJARAT Vs JAMNAGAR JILLA KHANGI PRATHMIKSHIKSHAK SANGH on 30 October 2001
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No 43 of 1998 in SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATIONNo 13520 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No 43 of 1998
in
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATIONNo 13520 of 1994
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF GUJARAT
Versus
JAMNAGAR JILLA KHANGI PRATHMIKSHIKSHAK SANGH
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR AJ DESAI, AGP, for Appellants No. 1-3
RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT
and
MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT)
It appears from the record and submissions of the learned AGP, Mr.Desai, that Special Civil Application No.13520 of 1994 was, mistakenly, treated as a group matter decided by the learned single Judge on 9.5.97 which was pertaining to medical allowance, whereas, in the present case, the main relief is about the stoppage of payment of amount of Rs.100 per month as interim relief to the teachers. Therefore, Special Civil Application No.13520/94 should not have been enumerated and added in the group matters as it is not connected or allied matter. The learned AGP drew our attention, in course of the hearing, as other side has remained absent though duly served.
In the circumstances, the only course open for us is to set aside the impugned order insofar as this petition is concerned as it does not pertain to the common subject upon which the group matters came to be decided and remit the matter to the learned single Judge for fresh hearing and adjudication in accordance with law.
Consequently, the impugned judgment, in so far as Special Civil Application No.13520 of 1994 is concerned, shall stand quashed and set aside. As a necessary corollary, the matter is remitted to the learned single Judge, taking up such matters for adjudication in accordance with law.
The appeal is accordingly allowed to the aforesaid extent with no order as to costs.
����(J.N.Bhatt, J.)
����(D.H.Waghela, J.)
(vjn)