Gujarat High Court
ARBI.P/17/1999 of JAYESH TRADING CORPORATION Vs UNION OF INDIA on 17 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD PETN,UNDER ARBITRATION ACT. No 17 of 1999 with PETITION UNDER ARBITRATION ACT NOS. 18 AND 19 OF 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble ACTG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR. C.K.THAKKAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
PETN,UNDER ARBITRATION ACT. No 17 of 1999
with
PETITION UNDER ARBITRATION ACT NOS. 18 AND 19 OF 1999
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble ACTG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR. C.K.THAKKAR
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- JAYESH TRADING CORPORATION
Versus
UNION OF INDIA
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR SANDEEP N BHATT for Petitioner MR JC SHETH for Respondent No. 1, 2
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : ACTG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR. C.K.THAKKAR Date of decision: 17/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
These applications are filed for appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as `Act'). Notice was issued by this Court pursuant to which the respondents have appeared.
I have heard, at length, learned counsel for the parties.
Almost in similar circumstances, on November 5, 1999 in Arbitration Petition No. 10 of 1998, an order was passed and direction was issued that an arbitration to be named by the General Manager, Western Railway may be appointed.
It is not disputed by and between the parties that cases on hand are also similar to that of Arbitration Petition No. 10 of 1998.
In the circumstances, following the order dated November 5, 1999 in Arbitration Petition No. 10 of 1998, it is directed that General Manager, Western Railway will appoint one arbitrator. Final order will be passed within two weeks from receipt of the writ.
Accordingly, all petitions are disposed of. No order as to costs.
--
parekh