Gujarat High Court

MCA/771/1999 of NATVERBHAI ATMARAM PATEL Vs GUJARAT STATE CO-OPERATIVE COTTON FEDERATION on 17 December 1999

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION No 771 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION No 771 of 1999

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and

MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA

============================================================

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO

to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO

of the judgement?

4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO

of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO

-------------------------------------------------------------- NATVERBHAI ATMARAM PATEL

Versus

GUJARAT STATE CO-OPERATIVE COTTON FEDERATION

-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:

MR AK CLERK for Petitioner

MR BS PATEL for Respondent No. 1, 2, 3

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA

Date of decision: 17/12/1999

ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per R.K. Abichandani, J)

Page 1 of 2

1. When this application is called out, the learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that during the pendency of this application the petitioner has received some amounts under the award. It is stated that as regards the disputed amount to which the petitioner is entitled to under the award, the petitioner has already preferred a recovery application and will prefer further such application as may be permissible under the law. Subject to the rights and contentions of the petitioner, the learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw this application. In this view of the matter, there remains no ground for proceeding further in this contempt application.

Rule is discharged with no order as to costs.

(devu)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead