Gujarat High Court
MCA/771/1999 of NATVERBHAI ATMARAM PATEL Vs GUJARAT STATE CO-OPERATIVE COTTON FEDERATION on 17 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION No 771 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION No 771 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- NATVERBHAI ATMARAM PATEL
Versus
GUJARAT STATE CO-OPERATIVE COTTON FEDERATION
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR AK CLERK for Petitioner
MR BS PATEL for Respondent No. 1, 2, 3
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA
Date of decision: 17/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per R.K. Abichandani, J)
Page 1 of 2
1. When this application is called out, the learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that during the pendency of this application the petitioner has received some amounts under the award. It is stated that as regards the disputed amount to which the petitioner is entitled to under the award, the petitioner has already preferred a recovery application and will prefer further such application as may be permissible under the law. Subject to the rights and contentions of the petitioner, the learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw this application. In this view of the matter, there remains no ground for proceeding further in this contempt application.
Rule is discharged with no order as to costs.
(devu)
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…