Gujarat High Court
WTR/30/1991 of DHANSUKHLAL GAFURBHAI PATE Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX on 21 December 2002
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD WEALTH TAX REFERENCE No 30 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
WEALTH TAX REFERENCE No 30 of 1991
For Approval and Signature:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.MEHTA
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- DHANSUKHLAL GAFURBHAI PATEVersus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. WEALTH TAX REFERENCE No. 30 of 1991
MR JP SHAH for Petitioner No. 1 MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.MEHTA
Date of decision: 21/12/2002
The following question of law, arising out of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'C', has been referred to this court for its opinion under the provisions of sec. 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.
Page 1 of 2
"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee was entitled to the exemption under sec. 5(1)(xvia) in respect of of the case, the assessee was entitled to the exemption under sec. 5(1)(xvia) in respect of the National Defence Gold Bonds, 1980?"
2. Similar question had been raised in Wealth Tax Reference No. 34 of 1991. This court has disposed of the said reference by answering the question in favour of the assessee and against the revenue by its judgment dated 21.12.2002. The question referred to this court in this reference is also, therefore, answered in the affirmative, i.e., in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.
The reference stands disposed of with no order as to costs.
�����(A.R. Dave, J.)
�����(K.M. Mehta, J.)
(hn)
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…