Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/1607/2001 of KIRTAN LAL PATANWAR Vs STATE OF C.G.andORS. on 4 December 2001
}r WWW WW” ‘ t’- ’"3 Wm r x~ N THE maxi scum er JUDICA w BIPUR RIT Pmmxm N @7 3m ‘ z m; years, ksidemt of Bitkula,‘l‘ahsil % A e a 6f atsgarhwhroug ‘sacretary nmmmemt sf schoel m Th stm ehhtih the ? e W é mK. Rn: ldings, Raipur. Deputy
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
’-’"3‘ éEi
INTHE maxi scum er JUDICATURE Aw BIPURLAs(cG.)@7VWRIT Pmmxm Ne03 2&13m3m‘zKirtanLa).Patanwarm; S/oRamBeerPatanwar,a§a@. aboutyears,ksidemt ofBitkula,‘l‘ahsiland@ mstrictBilasx’.pu$33%«?cw,‘
ANEt(,~1AThestma6fehhtihatsgarhwhrougthe?§l‘sacretary nmmmemte sfschoel mWmK. Rn: ldings,Raipur.Deputy Direéter 3f Edmation,mstrictmlaspur.»(w).t‘eollegtar,mlaspur;2—[;]}rWmwr‘ ‘mstrivfct mlasw.QnWWW,t»Qxeg‘65w'am PowmmarW?WW”x~
XI~HCv22
mamazmy.Wfamg
'
L2»)
my?[tfw]
.mEaN.gd.Lwz/NW m
WW W§7
%m
W[Em]m BWmKWWW?l W 3331??’04. 12.2001Heard Shri Sudhir' Var-ma,Imed counsei for The pefi'fioner.
Heard also 5hri Rajeev 5hri asTava, learned Panel Lawyer for‘I’he responden'r No.1 / Sfafe.Adpe‘ri‘rionsubmiffedbefofheAdminisfm‘riveTribunala?Jabalpur is sTiH pending.The grieces of The pe‘ri'rioner have been‘rhehighlightedinsaidpe'ii'i'ion.nThisviewof The TmaTTeriTissubmiTTed by5hri RajeevShrivas ava ThaT Thelearned Tribunal aTJabalpur be direcTedTo disposeThe maTTer expediTiously.TheiiissueraisedbyThewriTpeTiTioTiershould’begiludicaTeduponbefore The STaTe AdminisTraTive Tr'bunal.
IntheresgifThispe'ri'rions disposedof wiThThedirecTiori’ThaT ThepeTiTion¢& pendingbelforeThe5TaTeAdminisTmTiveTribunalaTJabalpurperTainingToThegrievancesofThewriTpeTiTioner[shall][ be][ heard][ and][ disposed][ of][ as][ expediTiously]as possibleas The maTTer has been pending for quiTe some Time.IT is also hopedThaT soOn The STaTe AdminisTraTiveTribunal would have a Full Bench.,&Sdl-’Chief Justice SS