Gujarat High Court
SCA/4989/1999 of MOHANBVHAI M SOLANKI Vs TALUKA DEVELOPMENT OFFICER on 11 October 2002
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4989 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4989 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- MOHANBVHAI M SOLANKI
Versus
TALUKA DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 4989 of 1999 MR GAURANG H BHATT for Petitioner No. 1 MR PREMAL R JOSHI for Respondent No. 1 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 2-4 RULE UNSERVED for Respondent No. 5
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI
and
MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA
Date of decision: 11/10/2002
Page 1 of 2
ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI) 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that this petition is identical to the group of petitions, which have been disposed of with the Letters Patent Appeal No.1177/2001, decided on 8.2.2002 (reported in 2002 (1) GLH 659). Those petitions were rejected by the said order along with the Letters Patent Appeal.
2. Following the decision of the Full Bench in the said Letters Patent Appeal and cognate petitions, this petition is rejected. Rule is discharged with no order as costs. ����(R.K. Abichandani, J.)
����(J.R. Vora, J.)
p.n.nair
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…