Gujarat High Court

SCA/4989/1999 of MOHANBVHAI M SOLANKI Vs TALUKA DEVELOPMENT OFFICER on 11 October 2002

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4989 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4989 of 1999

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI

and

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA

============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- MOHANBVHAI M SOLANKI

Versus

TALUKA DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 4989 of 1999 MR GAURANG H BHATT for Petitioner No. 1 MR PREMAL R JOSHI for Respondent No. 1 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 2-4 RULE UNSERVED for Respondent No. 5

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI

and

MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA

Date of decision: 11/10/2002

Page 1 of 2

ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI) 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that this petition is identical to the group of petitions, which have been disposed of with the Letters Patent Appeal No.1177/2001, decided on 8.2.2002 (reported in 2002 (1) GLH 659). Those petitions were rejected by the said order along with the Letters Patent Appeal.

2. Following the decision of the Full Bench in the said Letters Patent Appeal and cognate petitions, this petition is rejected. Rule is discharged with no order as costs. ����(R.K. Abichandani, J.)

����(J.R. Vora, J.)

p.n.nair

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead