Gujarat High Court
SCA/118/1991 of SADHNA VIDYAMANDAL TRUST Vs CHHANUBHAI B PANCHOLI on 1 December 1997
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No.118 of 1991 ** For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No.118 of 1991
**
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA.
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
1 to 5 : No
-------------------------------------------------------------- SADHNA VIDYAMANDAL TRUST
Versus
CHHANUBHAI B PANCHOLI
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR KB PUJARA for Petitioners
MR RK MISHRA for Respondent No.1 (not present)
SERVED for Respondent No. 2
GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 3, 4
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. Date of decision: 01/12/97
ORAL JUDGEMENT :
Shri K.B. Pujara, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the parties to the dispute have resolved the dispute outside the Court by mutual settlement and an affidavit is also placed on record to that effect, which is taken on record.
2. In view of the above the petitioner does not press the petition. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as not pressed. Rule is discharge. No order as to costs.
sca 118/91
-oOo-
karim*