Gujarat High Court
SCA/6612/1998 of RANCHHODBHAI BHIKHABHAI CHAUHAN Vs CHAIRMAN GUJARAT PUBLIC WORK CONTRACT DISPUTES ARBITRATION on 4 November 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6612 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6612 of 1998
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- RANCHHODBHAI BHIKHABHAI CHAUHAN
Versus CHAIRMAN GUJARAT PUBLIC WORK CONTRACT DISPUTES ARBITRATION -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PK PANCHOLI for Petitioner Mr.S.P.Hasurkar, learned Addl.G.P. with Mr.S.A.Pandya,learned A.G.P. for the respondents. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA Date of decision: 04/11/98ORAL JUDGEMENT Rule. Mr. Pandya, learned A.G.P. waives service of rule on behalf of respondents.
It is not disputed before this Court that the petitioner, who has been already working as a driver with the respondent since July 1995, is duly registered with the Employment Exchange and is still working as such with the respondents. The respondents have considered only those candidates, whose names have been sponsored by the Employment Exchange. The interviews were held between those candidates, whose names have been sponsored by the Employment Exchange. The interviews were held between 1.6.98 and 4.6.98. The present petitioner has also applied for the post of driver in February 1998. It is also stated by Mr. Hasurkar that although the interviews were held in June 1998, so far no appointment orders have been issued because of the interim order passed by this court.
In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is directed that the petitioner's case shall also be considered even now before any appointments are made by is directed that the petitioner's case shall also be considered even now before any appointments are made by interviewing the petitioner. All consequences to follow.
This Special Civil Application is accordingly allowed. Rule is made absolute in the terms, as aforesaid. No order as to costs.
-0-