SCA/391/1991 of RATILAL M MISTRY Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 19 December 1997

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?

4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?

Nos 1 to 5 No

-------------------------------------------------------------- RATILAL M MISTRYVersus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BJ JADEJA for Petitioner Mr.VB GARANIA, AGP for Respondent No. 1, 2, 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA Date of decision: 19/12/97

ORAL JUDGEMENT

Mr.Garania, learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the land was taken in the management for a period of five years. Period of five years expired in the year 1995 during the pendency of this Special Civil Application. Even if there was interim order in favour of the petitioner whereas the period for which the land was taken into management has already expired this Special Civil Application does not survive and the same has become infructuous. Accordingly this Special Civil Application is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. Rule is hereby discharged. Interim order automatically comes to an end. No order as to costs.

���--- m.m.bhatt