Chhattisgarh High Court

WP/538/2001 of KU.NISHA SHRIVAS and ANR Vs STATE OF C.G. TH THE BURE.DEPTand ORS. on 11 December 2003

Cites 0, Cited by 0

couEC_.OF_caa2.asa&. a :.^'.c, BilAaig ^uW^>.Ho._. ./2001 |-,!i»!^ -s PBEISIONS1 l^ s 1. Eu- Hisha Shx±-va.a, S/o Sbra. Basantlal Sbil.TSts,^ aged about 28 yesrs ^ Vo 7/8 Bailway. Golcny iA" ^.-^- ^G:1 fp•/ J\v ./' .«• Baradwar, lelasil-Sakt.l Dlstri.et-

|-,!i»!^

-s

-J>!

l cS^EBfr

iffl '3SEHIGH couEC_.OF_caa2.asa&.a:.^'.c, BilAaig^uW^>.Ho._../2001

W^>.Ho._../2001

s 1.Eu- Hisha Shx±-va.a,S/o Sbra. Basantlal Sbil.TSts,^l^•/J\vfpaged about 28 yesrs^Vo 7/8 Bailway. GolcnyiA"^.-^- ^G:1Baradwar, lelasil-Sakt.l.«•Dlstri.et- Janjgir CI&npa.

PBEISIONS1

.«• Janjgir CI&npa. CI&npa../'^.,.-'^.~r?>-*".,••• o 'C^t 2.Avinasti 'Ei.i'Tasi.,'f^"Q\^S/o Shsi'Dliiedi Siva.Ti, VS//.4cuagal attout 28 ymrs,1 ((j^1ye&tiaduar iCeiasil-Sakti.,Distri.ct- Janjgir Cianpa.

.Q^^y"'f^"Q\"'cy^C-

A.^'?^&.W'^

^

^"....HE^OSBMIS

•':

- Tei-gHiS-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. State of Gbtattis^iyIhrougbs Secretary,|Bepartaent of Panebayat.Mantialaya, Sias'fcri. QhwSs.\feipur.:

L.—^£faeGia-ef Esecnt.lve OfO.eeT,Hagar fa.ncta.ja.t,Naya Barad^ar;District-tTanjgir Glaanjpa*

'

3. SiQ Gollector,JanjgirGIanpa.

•^I P EeiIIOH UEBBl,ABEICT.,^_226/227 JQE. ZiBJE_.i.SOHgSi.aiim_a^.i^i£.SE'ofi;.isss6<3B0i'':'Al;:gic|aaa.Vm.S IH IjEIE mSDKEiQt CBt®:OS&E3:,ja ^@|g•EM^SSiSS.^^&.-Qs.&s^-oxsm <ssi>m/wSWs, 1'!*.i;K!a •ua T^ "41'illcl^, •iiTfl^lic, (aicii'yy W*<W. 'awieia

18 -

-i-

^^!r[•€^^

'i-frqpirgfflrai

311^1 qnWlfeat7! Wl^f'? ft'zt <R«$K[<;-li°b 3f(^Ian^r^aiWHft^^3lf:W3Ii^T^Hiqi ^tfi^Coiinsel for the respondt^^nt / intRryener siibmits that letit be done within 15 days frouttoday.Comisel for the petitfone^^ ftuther prays that interim staygranted on 19.04.2001 may Nallowed to contiaue.Counsel for respondent State and tntervcner subcaitj/that till the appjlcation for^tay is ffled and heard by ttieauthority, the interim orderm|ay conttnue.It 1s ordered accordtagly.]If the petition and appli<|:^atmn of stav is not filed within15 days then the continuancel[would not be permitted.With fhe aforesaidob^ervations and directions, thispetitions stands disposed of.CertUied copy as per rultjs.Sd/-FakhruddinJudge J

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead