Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/2882/2000 of M.D.VAISHNU Vs STATE OF M.P. and ORS. on 7 December 2000
cgiMcQURT OF g‘qglggTUREAaLmggm mm Pmmxom Ho‘._éé§§£(2c>oo E5 Du Valsmu b/o Hanwnaa Das Valsimu ageé 48 years, £ccountaau, i”: the offiga of the } Blotm natleatioa officer, Dabhra, District Janjgir- Champa ('bi;.Pe) a “33 TIDNE?
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE H1 cgiMcQURTOF g‘qglggTUREAaLmggmmm Pmmxom Ho‘._éé§§£(2c>oo “33TIDNE?
“33TIDNE?E5 DuValsmu b/o Hanwnaa[Das]Valsimuageé 48 years,£ccountaau,i”:[the]offiga[of]the} Blotm natleatioaofficer,Dabhra,District Janjgir-Champa('bi;.Pe)aVsgRE$PONDENTIS1.hateoi“ Nd?”tnmuga the$ecmtary, Deparizmeut[of][ behool]Mucatlon, Mmis‘ary01sphaclLducatim, Vallabh Em[ Ha”),]Bhopal(MyP‘J[.]2;Diractor,»[Imblic][ instructions]'{iatpudaBhéwa'n ,Bhogal(m,[Pb.])[a]3.;The Joint Director,mucation,Bib. spm‘ Division,Bilaspur (Ii-492.:4.‘$hri Lohi‘t[Kunmr]Pa'tel,[§/o]Ramanchal mngh[P‘a‘ael]a‘Accounmtant,officaoftug Blackmucaticm officer ,Dabhra ,Disrbt.Janjg’iruchmnpa MOP,»155???gNmmrr; Ng}?[Impwg$]