WP(C)/23014/2015 of SUKANTI DEI Vs STATE OF ORISSA on 24 December 2015

W.P.(C) No. 23014 of 201524.12.2015 Heard Mr. D.K. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Senapati, learned 24.12.2015 Heard Mr. D.K. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Senapati, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate.

The petitioner files this application claiming for extension of contractual employment in view of the fact that similar benefit has already extended to the similarly situated employees.

Mr. B. Senapati, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate states that Government has already instructed not to give any contractual employment as lectures in aided colleges and because of that reason the petitioner could hot have been appointed.

Considering the contention raised by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court is not inclined to entertain this application. Since the petitioner has appointed on contractual basis, he may approach the appropriate forum ventilating her grievance instead of approaching this Court by filing the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed.

Dr. B.R. Sarangi,J.

Ashok