WP(C)/40164/2021 of SANTOSH KUMAR NAYAK Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 24 December 2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 40164 of 2021

….. Vs.

PetitionerMr.M. Mishra, Advocate

Santosh Kumar Nyaak

…..

Opposite partiesState Counsel

State of Odisha and another

CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER24.12.2021

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

Order No.1

2. Heard.

3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite party no.1 to consider the representation of the petitioner vide Annexure-5 taking into consideration the intimation given by opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-8 for regularization of service of the petitioner in Group-D post.

4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made a representation to opposite party No.1 vide Annexure-5 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, taking into consideration Annexures-7 and 8, to which learned counsel for the State has no objection.

5. As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-5, taking into consideration Annexures-7 and 8, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

(DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)