Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/2050/2005 of SMT.KUNTI GUPTA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ORS. on 23 December 2005
JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri S.R. Nayak, CJ Petitioner Respondents Writ Petition .No. 2050 OF 2005 Smt. Kunti Gupta, W/o Raj Kumar Gupta. Aged about 53 years, R/o Kedarpur. Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (Chhattisgarh) Versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR
Single Bench:
Hon'ble Shri S.R. Nayak, CJ
Writ Petition .No. 2050 OF 2005
Petitioner
Smt. Kunti Gupta, W/o Raj Kumar Gupta.Agedabout53years,R/oKedarpur.Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (Chhattisgarh)
Versus
Respondents
Present:
Shri Manoj Paranjpe, learned counsej for the petitioner.Shri Utkarsh Verma learned Deputy Government Advocatefor the State Of Chhattisgarh.
ORAL ORDER
(Passed on
23rd of December 2005)
By the impugned action, the petitioner has been black-listed for aperiod of 2 years. The admitted position is that the impugned action wasnot preceded by any notice to the petitioner to show cause as to why heshould not be black-Iisted. Affected should be apprised is a Constitutionalcreed flowing from Article 14 of the Constitution of India and insisted byprinciples of naturai justice. There is a flagrant violation of the said rule jnthe instant case. On thsft short ground, the writ petition is allowed and theimpugned orderis quashed. There shallbe noorder as to costs. However,this order shall not come in the way of the respondents, if so advised, from i -3.- teking appropriate steps to black-list thepetittoner in accordance with lawand in conformity with the principles of natural justice.
Sd/-Chief Justice
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…