Gujarat High Court
SCA/6551/1996 of SALIM ISMAIL BADAT Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 6 November 1996
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6551 of 1996 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6551 of 1996
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA Sd/-
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
Nos. 1 to 5 No.
-------------------------------------------------------------- SALIM ISMAIL BADATVersus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
No one appears for the petitioner. Mr.Neegam Shukla,AGP for Respondents.
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA
Date of decision: 06/11/96
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Mr.Shukla has pointed out that this is a second petition challenging the detention order dated 27.4.1996 passed by the District Magistrate, Bharuch. The detention order had already been revoked, Rule is discharged way back on 4.9.1996 and therefore even first Special Civil Application No. 5136 of 1996 has been dismissed today as having become infructuous, this being second petition against the same order does not lie and even otherwise it is futile to consider the validity of the detention order because the same has already been revoked by the Government.
This Special Civil Application is accordingly dismissed as futile and Rule is hereby discharged.
����----