Orissa High Court

WP(C)/31356/2024 of SANJAYA KUMAR MANSINGH Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 24 December 2024

of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 31356 of 2024 Sanjaya Kumar Mansingh & Ors. ..... Petitioners Mr. S. Behera, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Anr. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S.K. Jee, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 24.12.2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WP(C) No. 31356 of 2024

Sanjaya Kumar Mansingh & .....Ors.

Petitioners

Mr. S. Behera, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha & Anr. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S.K. Jee, AGA

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHYORDER24.12.2024

Order No. 01

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. appearing for the Opp. Parties.

3. Petitioners have filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- following prayer:- “Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, it is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus by directing the Opp. Parties to consider the case of the petitioners for appointment in the post of Junior Teacher Schematic taking into consideration the fact that there are more than 6000 vacancies available.

Or pass such other order/orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

And for which act of kindness the petitioners as in duty bound shall ever pray.”

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that though highlighting their grievances, Petitioners have filed an application at Annexure-5 to the Writ Petition before the Opp. Party No. 2, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, Page 1 of 2.

Page 1 of 2

learned counsel for the Petitioners prays that a direction be issued to Opposite Party No. 2 to take a decision on the above noted Petition within a specific time period.

5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No. 2 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the Petitioners.

6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.

Sneha

(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)Judge

Signature Not Verified

Digitally SignedSigned by: SNEHANJALI PARIDADesignation: Sr. StenographerReason: AuthenticationLocation: High Court of Orissa, CuttackDate: 24-Dec-2024 11:54:06

Page 2 of 2.

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead