Chhattisgarh High Court
CRA/2172/1999 of Vikas Kumar Agrawal Vs Gurubux Singh on 24 November 2001
Kochar, couxisel for the appellant. shri S.C. Dutt, Sr. Aclvocate with Shri Gurudev §’ 1 l § Sharan, counsel for the resgondent. 4 I i a ? Heard. ,l‘ 3 l g A ‘ Thé cause-list shows nher namé’ of ‘ the counsel i‘ ‘ 1, wha has been
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
| ee ee
| ee eeeeeeceeeeeRere Bh a Jteeereeceaeae NIce AoeCe[Bek]aeee. OUR EO”CEG le io iNOSoeaOOyes pares poe De ye ee OLa| : :
|
|
|
| : :
|
AT JABALPURS = JABALPURS = = JUDICATURE:Ge 267S& AV2\95
;
~~”
SN THE
AT JABALPURS = JABALPURS = =HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE:
|
7 -:
a
.| os re
ae
|
;||
-
:
Application u/s 378 (4) _ of the CrePeCe .
|
ee
Appellant
;Vikas Kumar Agrawal S/o. Bajranglal Kumar Agrawal S/o. Bajranglal S/o. Bajranglal Bajranglal oo== agrawal R/o ward No.14, ManendragerhDistrict Sargujae=
Vikas Kumar Agrawal S/o. Bajranglal Kumar Agrawal S/o. Bajranglal S/o. Bajranglal Bajranglal oo | ne Complainant od| a oO
CO
|
ae
|
op
Respondent:Accused
Gurubux Singh S/o late Rabel SinghJ.S, Industry R/o Ward |‘proprietor[M/s]’o.13, Ola Gurudwara, Mandnudragarh-<District Sargujae eeerr oe rr - OC
ae
a
SO
|
|
:
Appeal U/s_ 378 (4) of U/s_ 378 (4) of 378 (4) of (4) of ofCrePeCs_
Appeal U/s_ 378 (4) of U/s_ 378 (4) of 378 (4) of (4) of ofCrePeCs__|‘Phe appellant being aggrieved by the judgment and—| dt, 21.8.98, passed in Cr. Appeal No. 27/97, where 21.8.98, passed in Cr. Appeal No. 27/97, where passed in Cr. Appeal No. 27/97, where in Cr. Appeal No. 27/97, where Cr. Appeal No. 27/97, where Appeal No. 27/97, where No. 27/97, where where©
Oo
| 4g Order dt, 21.8.98, passed in Cr. Appeal No. 27/97, where 21.8.98, passed in Cr. Appeal No. 27/97, where passed in Cr. Appeal No. 27/97, where in Cr. Appeal No. 27/97, where Cr. Appeal No. 27/97, where Appeal No. 27/97, where No. 27/97, where where :3
:a+ee
by allowed the appeal of the respondent and set-aside conviction vide .order dt. 7.2.97, which was passed vide .order dt. 7.2.97, which was passed .order dt. 7.2.97, which was passed dt. 7.2.97, which was passed 7.2.97, which was passed which was passed was passed the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Manendragarh- Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Manendragarh- Chief Judicial Magistrate, Manendragarh- Judicial Magistrate, Manendragarh- Magistrate, Manendragarh- Manendragarh-in Cr. Case No. 44/96, U/s 138 of the Negotiable‘Instrument Act, begs to prefer this appeal against the‘gequittal om the following facts and groundss~
‘the conviction vide .order dt. 7.2.97, which was passed vide .order dt. 7.2.97, which was passed .order dt. 7.2.97, which was passed dt. 7.2.97, which was passed 7.2.97, which was passed which was passed was passed |
FT by the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Manendragarh- Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Manendragarh- Chief Judicial Magistrate, Manendragarh- Judicial Magistrate, Manendragarh- Magistrate, Manendragarh- Manendragarh- a - - amo :
-
a
-
|
oo
|
ooFacts of the case
|
|