CRA/1166/1995 of SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Vs MAHAMAD HANIF ABDUL HAMID on 30 December 1999

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2. To be referred to the reporters or not ?

3. Whether their lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?

4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950, or any order made thereunder ?

5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?

--------------------------------------------------------- SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

VERSUS

MAHAMAD HANIF ABDUL HAMID

--------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:

Mr.NIKHIL CARIEL for petitioner

None present for Respondent

--------------------------------------------------------- Coram: MR.JUSTICE S.K. Keshote,J

Date of decision:30/12/1999

C.A.V. JUDGMENT

#. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the civil revision application.

#. This civil revision application has come up for preliminary hearing in the court on 19th July 1995 on which date, the court admitted the same and interim relief in terms of para 6(B) has been granted and the same continues for all these years. This revision application arises from the suit of the year 1995 and looking to the controversy which has arisen in the suit, it is in the larger interest that still if the stay continues the same may be continued till decision of the civil suit. The learned trial court is directed to dispose of the suit itself within a period of six months from the date of receipt of writ of this order. Rule and civil revision application stand disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.

.......

[sunil]