Gujarat High Court
LPA/161/1982 of MADHUBEN SOMABHAI PATEL Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 9 November 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No 161 of 1982 in SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATIONNo 3669 of 1981 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and MR.JUSTICE C.K.BUCH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No 161 of 1982
in
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATIONNo 3669 of 1981
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and
MR.JUSTICE C.K.BUCH
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- MADHUBEN SOMABHAI PATELVersus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR SHALIN N MEHTA of M/S NJ MEHTA ASSO. for Appellant MR BY MANKAD for Respondent No. 1 MR JC SHETH for Respondent No. 2
MR VJ DESAI for Respondent No. 3, 4
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and MR.JUSTICE C.K.BUCH Date of decision: 09/11/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT
On behalf of the respondent it is stated that the amount of arrears which comes to Rs.38,250/80 has been received in accordance with the decision rendered by learned Single Judge and the appellant is absorbed in secondary section of the school. In view of this, learned advocate states that the appeal has become infructuous. Xerox copies of letter dated 2.8.1984, undertaking in the form of letter dated 2.8.1984 and letter dated 2.8.1984 written by DEO are ordered to be taken on record.
This appeal stands disposed of as infructuous. No order as to costs. csm./���---------------