Gujarat High Court
CR.MA/4759/1997 of HARISHBHAI DHARMSI PATEL Vs GOVINDSINH JAGANNATHSINH RAJPUT on 24 October 1997
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No 4759 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.G.KARIA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No 4759 of 1997
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.G.KARIA
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- HARISHBHAI DHARMSI PATELVersus GOVINDSINH JAGANNATHSINH RAJPUT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BN RAVAL for Petitioners MR JAYESH A DAVE for Respondent No. 1 MR.N.D.GOHIL,ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE D.G.KARIA Date of decision: 24/10/97
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Rule. Mr.N.D.Gohil, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent No.2-State. Mr.Jayesh A.Dave, learned Advocate, waives service of rule on behalf of respondent I have heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties, and the learned A.P.P., Mr.N.D.Gohil, for the second respondent.
The parties have arrived at amicable settlement outside the Court and the complainant-respondent No.1
does not intend to proceed further in the complaint lodged by him against the petitioners. Even otherwise, having regard to the overall facts and circumstances and material on record, the incident involved is of civil nature.
In the above premises, the petition is allowed.
The complaint registered at C.R.No.I 473 of 1996 of Vatva Police Station and the investigation carried thereunder are hereby ordered to be quashed. Rule is accordingly made absolute.
���***