Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/43415/2016 of KANDUA BABU RAYUDU, E.G.DIST. Vs THE STATE OF A.P.,STAMPS,HYD.,AND 2 OTRS. on 30 December 2022
SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.43415 of 2016 ORDER: The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS,
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION No.43415 of 2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the Respondents herein in refusing by an endorsement Dated 14-11-2016 to register the Sale Deed Dated 01-11-2016 executed by the Petitioner herein in favour of Petcheti Chandrasekhar and his wife Prashanthi in respect of the property admeasuring 101 Square Yards in R.S.No.304/1 of Diwancheruvu Village, hamlet of Palacherla Revenue Village, Rajanagaram Mandal, East Godavari District on the ground that the said property is in the Prohibited List of alienation as illegal, arbitrary, illogical, discriminatory, without jurisdiction, opposed to Principles of Natural Justice and violative of the provisions of Indian Registration Act, besides being violative of Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the Respondents herein to register and release the above Sale Deed to the Petitioner herein”.
1. Sri Venkateswarlu Chakkilam, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. Therefore, the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
2. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
_______________________
JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
36
GSP/PSR
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
(Infructuous)
WRIT PETITION No.43415 of 2016
Date : 30.12.2022