Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/21180/2019 of Turlapati Veera Raghavamma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 31 December 2019
KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI WRIT PETITION No.21180 of 2019 ORDER: Petitioner’s case, in short, is that, pursuant to the notification dated 06.02.2012 for recruitment to the post of Principals, Post Graduate and Trained Graduate Teachers, 2012 in A.P.Model Schools, she got selected as against
HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI WRIT PETITION No.21180 of 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Petitioner’s case, in short, is that, pursuant to the notification dated 06.02.2012 for recruitment to the post of Principals, Post Graduate and Trained Graduate Teachers, 2012 in A.P.Model Schools, she got selected as against the single Trained Graduate Teacher (Hindi) post notified; alleging that, TGT (Hindi) has to deal with VI to X Classes with a maximum strength of 500 students, whereas other TGTs deal with only VI to VIII with a maximum strength of 300 students per school and there is recruitment as well as promotion to the post of PGTs from the feeder category of TGTs but there is no promotion as PGT (Hindi) and has to remain TGT (Hindi) through out her service, she made representation dated 12.12.2019 before respondent No.2 that promotional channel be created in the coming service rules for existing TGT (Hindi) to get promotion as PGT (Hindi) on par other subject TGTs; and, thus, she seeks a direction to respondent No.2 to dispose of her representation dated 12.12.2019 before finalization of the Service Rules by the Department.
Learned Government Pleader for School Education submits that the representation dated 12.12.2019 made by the petitioner would be disposed of expeditiously.
Without going into the merits of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2 to dispose of the representation dated 12.12.2019 made by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________________
KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI, J
Dt:31.12.2019 Note:CC one week bo usd