Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/1012/2001 of RANJIT KUMAR SUR Vs UNION OF INDIA and ORS. on 8 November 2001
c ^) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIIASPUR CHHATTISGARH. Ji".l.Z/C^L WRIT PETITIOH HO. ^Js"r~> /2001 sg e PETITIOSER: iliS)IS^ili' i^'f ^^.^.^5^:- iQ.^-^'j?:.^;"" .--!?d^"" •* . 'I->'k'"' / ' ..*'^ilO' ., S'i ^•v'"AWi^,\:<Si
i^'filiS)IS^ili'
^)
rc ^"
^11
c
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIIASPUR CHHATTISGARH.
Ji".l.Z/C^LWRIT PETITIOH HO.^Js"r~> /2001
Ranjlfc Kumar Sur, S/o Late shriB.K.Sur, age-50 years, resideatof Ganesh Nagar.Bilaspur.Thal &^ Distt- Bilaspur (C.G,),work.i.ngas Deputy Statlon Superintendentat S®E.Rly,Baradwar, underBilaspurS.E.Rly Divlsion.
PETITIOSER:
^^.^.^5^:-iQ.^-^'j?:.^;""•^•v'"AWi^,\:<Si^ilO'*.--!?d^"".,. S'i 'I->'k'"' /' ..*'^•"-.f^''^.?-"'"->*•••^....-^'^RESPONDENTS s VE R S US
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
(1) Union of India,tbrough ADRM.S.E.Rly.Bilaspur (C.G.)
(2) Shri v.Kalyan Rama, SiniorDivi.sional Operating Manager,S.E.Rly,Bllaspur,(C.G.)
(3) Senior Divisional PersonnelOfficer, s.E.Rly.Bilaspur (c.G.)
WRIT PETITION
TOIDER ARTICtE 226/227 OFTHE
GONSTITOTION OF INDIA.
KI-KG—78
^W.-^ fbf^pM
sn^t 'TW (•iql^sp)
aiiii^!^^^•i^if^••Ili8nBn•r«
^ST «41-41Ct'4, »Tll<H'|(o, fsj<rliyy...m^B^...........
Sti^T 'q^^ ('jqE^qsq)
GRPRI—FS/350—12/2000^50.000.
-3-si ^TFTIcTO, t?Tll'yll!o, Tq^TR"T<
.M.P...X9.,.•^^iS^3TR?!'?![<y}^ ^K.^,sTstfi ^<T!W ^rttti^PltcTq^^T Wq?ff ;-W;PT[•?][•BR?1]T3i3tyHWW^ajpost[in][ fcbe][ next]place[o£]poptiag.I shall alsoit clear that the post wbich| the petltioner isto join in the next place of|postit^[shall][ aot][ in][ aiy]^^t-Wicas®be lower in status than!tbe post beld by hlm asDeputy Station Superintenctei^t.I£thedue for pEoiaotion. let him c|laiin and theAutbority sball eonsider.Ij aa not iaclined to inter-fere witfa the order o£ transteer.With the above abservatiions,J the petAtJ.on is ^<J>[.-7>l'l.y]Sd/-Chief Justicess.•.-1.12-^'(^'^.c^-^-^ir^JL_c3-u'-'
^"^
^fs.
ifi
^^B 1,81
W.M
tSS^[^g^^il