Gujarat High Court
FA/8/1984 of G.S.R.T. CORPORATION Vs SWAMI GHANSHYAMSWARUPDAS GURUSHASTRI SHRI BALKRISHNADAS on 22 December 2000
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD FIRST APPEAL No 8 of 1984 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
FIRST APPEAL No 8 of 1984
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- G.S.R.T. CORPORATION
Versus
SWAMI GHANSHYAMSWARUPDAS GURUSHASTRI SHRI BALKRISHNADAS -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. First Appeal No. 8 of 1984 MR MD PANDYA for Petitioner MR PM RAVAL for Respondent No. 1 MR GAURANG H BHATT for Respondent No. 2
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
Date of decision: 22/12/2000
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Heard the Ld.Advocate Ms.Maya Desai for the appellant and Mr.Harin Raval for respondents.
2. Learned advocate Ms.Maya Desai seeks leave to reduce the claim from Rs.11,000/- to Rs.9,500/-.
Permission for reducing the amount of claim is granted.
3. Before effective hearing of this appeal learned advocates for the parties have submitted that the parties to the litigation have settled the matter out of the court and the respondents have agreed to accept the sum of Rs.9,500/- as compensation instead of Rs.11,000/awarded to the them.
4. In view of the above settlement the appeal is allowed and the judgment and decree passed by the trial court in MACP No.103/81 is quashed and set aside and it is directed that a fresh decree be drawn in pursuance of the agreement arrived amongst the parties. Rest of the decree and judgtment shall remain as it is. There shall be no order as to costs.
22.12.2000����(A.R.DAVE,J)