Gujarat High Court
SCA/2158/1985 of RAICHANDBHAI KEVALRAM THAKER Vs RADHANPUR NAGAR PANCHAYAT on 19 December 2000
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2158 of 1985 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2158 of 1985
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- RAICHANDBHAI KEVALRAM THAKER
Versus
RADHANPUR NAGAR PANCHAYAT
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR KG VAKHARIA for Petitioners - Absent
MR RN SHAH for Respondent No. 1 - Absent MR MAYUR R SHAH for Respondent No. 4 - Absent MR SB VAKIL for Respondent No. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10 - Absent
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI
and
MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH
Date of decision: 19/12/2000
Page 1 of 2
(Per : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI)
In this petition the provisions of Section 180 of the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 were challenged. The resolution dated 14.2.1985 at Annexure "A" to the Nagar Panchayat was also challenged. That resolution related to the Octroi contract for the period from 1.4.1985 to 31.3.1986 under Section 180 of the said Act. The Act of 1961 has been repealed and replaced by the Act of 1993.
The period of one year contemplated by the resolution was also over long back. This petition has therefore become infructuous. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs.
---
*/Mohandas
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…