WP/3845/2003 of RAM KUMAR YADAV Vs THE STATE OF C.G. AND OTHERS on 19 December 2003

1. PARTIbULARS OF THE PETITIONERAs mentioned in the cause title above.2.PARTICULARS (3F THE RESPONDENTSin the cause title above.~£$Wtioned+\\9"‘‘w \

amrm

.

w?3§§§2éi m3

WT:

m

WW @W$WW.

WWW???“

129.12.200§

5am Maena 6upm, ccunsel fm‘ fha peritioneraShri Renbir Singh Markus, Gm1". Advocafe for fhe SfaiHr-espondenis.Hem-d bo+h ihe gounseLBy fhis wrif pefi‘rion undar Articie 226/227 of[‘rhe] Co’nsiifm‘ion sf India,Thepe‘fi'fionerhaschaliengedfhearderdafed11.09.2003‘i‘hepassedbyPrincipal,GovtWomenPoly‘reghnkCollege} Rajnandgacn,by‘whichihepefh‘ioner has been asked+0 make aisr‘nkriive arrangemsnf as on acceunf of+ha recrui%m§nf of SC/ST persons hehas fro vocaie The pastThe pe’rifiomr‘s case is fhaf'h‘1e pefifiener was appoim‘arj as AssismmGrade-Iii em pérf‘orming fhe work ofSienographer‘ fmrti $0” October, 1§§8,in ['rhe]Sow. Women Pdyfahnic COHeg2i Rajnandgaon, Chhafi‘isgarh and he wqsgef‘fing[wages]as per fhe daiiy Wager1'ixedfr‘om fime fa fime.The pei‘i‘iionerwasalsoTeachingfhesfudenfsenrc”edandgoi'admif‘iadinfheWomehPofy‘fechnic CoHege, Rajna5dgaen, for F incii and EngiishSienogmphy[and][ 'iypirgg.]Thepefifiener‘possessesfineproflzssionaiDiplomainHindi&EnglishSfen'agmphy fmm fhe $evemmenf Polyiechnic €0iiege, Durg afid arse havingeducafion qualification up1‘0 MasTer0'i Ccmmarce {Previous}.Tiwé peiii'ionerwas aiso gaffing fhe r‘emunerafion of R:120/- per period for imparfing frainiiqg'ro The s?ydem‘s whanever ‘specéa! camhingwas conduci‘edforEhgiishx’Hindi$fenography and he discharges hEs dufies wi’fh ufmcs? sincerii‘y and' ioyaii-y aridfh’ere was nofhing adverse against him‘aridall 9f a sudden withouf giving anyoppor‘i’uniiyofheaking,’ Wepaiiiionel«hasbeenservedwii‘hanaiiceofA

50m

_‘l.farmindion (Annaxure P4) w} ichisiHegal,arbi‘i‘rar‘yl unjgsf and againsffyLmprinciples[of][ nci‘uml]jusfice.Learned Govt Ada/acmeappearing an behaif of ihe Siam/'respandeni‘ssubmitsfhm-fhepei‘ifionerisa daiiy wager empbyee;+here‘iior-e ha can berammed af am fime.Learned counsei for i'he pei‘iiianer submi'i's iha‘i' i‘eh pei‘i‘rioner is servingi. reguiariy and heis being rem‘wed wi‘rhouT any reasonShe further submifsii'haf[‘rhe]pe‘rifianer[may][ be]ail wed To make a repre$enfaf§on m respandems-raisinga”hisgrievanceadrespondeni'sbedirecfed.fodecidehis" represenfai‘ion affer considerig[T‘ne][ maferiai][ facts.]Having heard fheiear-n[vd]cgunsel for We parfies and having ragar-r} in:fhefaci‘s' and circumsmncesf Thec‘ase, the peTifieneris aliawed fa make ade‘miled represerwafian raising aii his grievances wifhin fen days from faciay farespcnéenf No.2 andin iurn,spondenf No.2 snail decide fhe neprese’nfa‘iionwi‘ihin aperiodof*rhir‘ry dayfromTheda‘ie ofreceipfof ihe samein anobjecfive manner wifh a redsad order.With the gbove observations and direcfions['ihe]pei‘ifien[sfands][ dispcsed]of.zIn View of fhis order,Ii\.(W.)P.No.3575/ZGO3 and LA. No.11390/2003iaiga smnd dispased Of,Pari'ies are enfij'ied forceriified copy of ih‘is order.