Gujarat High Court

FA/2667/1997 of A'BAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Vs ASHOK TALKIES, AHMEDABAD on 16 October 1997

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD FIRST APPEAL No 2667 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.D.SHAH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

FIRST APPEAL No 2667 of 1997

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.D.SHAH

============================================================

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?

4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?

-------------------------------------------------------------- A'BAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONVersus ASHOK TALKIES, AHMEDABAD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MG NAGARKAR for Petitioner MR PV NANAVATI for Respondent No. 1

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.D.SHAH Date of decision: 16/10/97

ORAL JUDGEMENT

1. Admit. Mr.P.V.Nanavaty appears and waives service of admission. With the consent of learned advocates appearing for parties matter is finally heard and disposed as per the consent terms which are produced before this court which are duly signed by Mr.S.A.Sacho, Assessor and Tax Collector of Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation as well as by Mr.Nagarkar as advocate of the corporation and by Mr.Nanavaty advocate for respondent with authority to compromise on the aforesaid terms from respondent. Consent terms are recorded and decree is passed in this appeal in terms of consent terms. In case of any difficulty in working out the consent terms parties will be at liberty to move this court only, i.e. S.D.Shah,J. Appeal stands disposed of accordingly in terms of compromise. ...

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead