Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/4074/2003 of DEVENDRA SINGH THAKUR Vs THE STATE OF C.G.and ORS. on 17 December 2003
XI-HC-22 sn^i^tT Ki-iiFban^f" ^*ii<=h ^ a ^'s^|<ii^KiI(,:»|t1*i'ris^!TOtrag^: *<i^<nraitii<*i stand disposedof. Pwties are entitled fopcerl) ^i^i^'i *lt^<^T'^1^t^ ^•freK i'^:^<HWq 3I)S?T..^,,"-,'1 If the
|
—=.” 4 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR|w.p. NO. ..4:.74, 12003/ —
|
-
oF:|
ee
.
PETITIONER
-Devendra Singh Thakur,
=
tS
|
Aged about 44 years
|
|
;
“F
Cc
|
.
oe
|
/ S/o Shri Brijlal Singh Thakur
_
:
t|1|a SaRESPONDENTS{a:ft.fo me)
Rio Kondagaon, Distt. Basger (CG)
© On
:
a
VERSUS _
:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. __ State of Chhattisgarh
{a:aeft.fo me)1{ oeQF"zoe\Fle.-—Bree. i;ae|aoe.of< en YY|_
Through- Secretary,Department of Forest Mantralaya, .
|
DKS. Bhawan Raipur (C-G.)
|
|
2. ForestConservator, Kanker,Distt. Kanker.
|
.
.
ey
:
|
oS
eoreeR, a
/
|
a
/-
3.- Divisional Forest Officer,
|
| ee a
-North-Kondagaon, Distt. Bastar (CG)
a|Oy|j gQoLoe Wyiaae N Y ee vs. 4 "anGe|a|yw|
“4.§-:D.0., Forest Keshkal,Distt. Bastar (C.G.)
|
|
oe
|
:
a
|
|-
re
D.L. Kawade, Upper Division Clerk,
|
;
Forest Department, Keshkal,7Distt. Bastar, (C.G.)oO
|
|
_
44|4
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 “OF THE CONSTITUTION OF_ INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF _WRIT_IN THE NATURE OF.CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND OTHERS SUITABLE_ WRITS DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS ORDER/ORDERS
|
|
ae
|
ee
_
| 7
;
|
; . . 7 | £ a oo- ; : a ;
| : ~ | S-—
|=a ;* ; “.
|i-: c : ;.Dsooa
er
tas APP ME PP 00
RET|
-
|
RESRRMss Sharmila Singha, Deputy.[Government]Advocate takes notice for ———sC By thispetitionsfiled under Articles 226/227 of theConstitutionof|nia, thepetitionerhas questionedthevalidity andproprietyof theorderSs |dated6-10-2003 passed by therespondent'No.3 bywhich he has been transferredfrom Keshkal toFarasgaop. Thepetitfrom Keshkal toFarasgaop. Thepetit toFarasgaop. ThepetitFarasgaop. Thepetitpetitis presntlyon presntlyononer working working=
Pa
|} 8
Pos
}
| transferredfrom Keshkal toFarasgaop. Thepetitfrom Keshkal toFarasgaop. Thepetit toFarasgaop. ThepetitFarasgaop. Thepetitpetitis presntlyon presntlyononer working working3| itmorderto-accommodate respondent No.5 ontheproposalof theS.D.0...The learned counsel for thepetitionersubmits that thepetitionerwhicteteh learned counsel forresporiddnts1 to 4 hasnoobjection.
=
Po
P|
ii|)whicteteh
_
|
| period of 7days and inturinrespondent No.t will decide therepreseritation”
^"^""^^^^SE^^^i^^j^^^^^S^^^^^B;''^^^'' "!^^'"^^^^^^:^-^^"-^''^^^^^^^^;',;-XI-HC-22^'s^|<ii^KiI(,:»|t1*i'ris^!TOtrag^:*<i^<nraitii<*isn^i^tT^i^i^'i *lt^<^T'^1^t^ ^•freKKi-iiFban^f"^*ii<=h ^ai'^:^<HWq 3I)S?T..^,,"-,'1If the petitionerisnofretlepecltherihenKybeatlowecl[to][ cpntinue][ in]the se'rviceti!! the pepresentatfonijWith these !jbservations,tH^writ petition is disp^sed of.fc'iftNo.3te53/2(»3and!.A.No.11,836^200^ dsostand disposedof.Pwties are entitled fopcerl)fied copy ofthisordep.SdAL.C.BhadooJudser.1>!