Gujarat High Court

SCA/15666/2004 of RAMABEN RAMESHKUMAR BHAGDE Vs RAJKOT COMMERCIAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD on 27 December 2004

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 15666 of 2004 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 15666 of 2004

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI

============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO

of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- RAMABEN RAMESHKUMAR BHAGDEVersus RAJKOT COMMERCIAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BAIJU JOSHI for Petitioner No. 1 PS GOGIA for Respondent No. 1

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI

Date of decision: 27/12/2004

ORAL JUDGEMENT

RULE. Mr. Gogia waives service of rule on behalf of the respondents.

2. Heard the learned advocates for the respective parties. After arguing the matter at length, a consensus has been arrived at and on the basis of such consensus, the following order is passed.

2.1. The order passed by the Tribual is modified to the extent that the petitioner shall deposit 33% of the decretal amount either by way of Demand Draft or purusuant to the disposing of the property as reflected in the advertisement at annexure-I to the petition. Such payment shall be made on or befoe 15th Feburay 2005. It is hoped that before confirming the sale, the Bank shall inform the same to the petitioner and three days' time will be granted and the petitioner shall also follow the same procdure. It is hoped that the Bank shall adhere to the upset price as referred to in the advertisement.

3. With the above directions, the petition stands disposed of. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent with no order as to costs.

����[K.S. JHAVERI, J.]

/phalguni/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead