Chhattisgarh High Court

WPS/10827/2019 of JEEVAN LAL KULDEEP Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 24 December 2019

CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP(S) No. 10827 of 2019 Jeevan Lal Kuldeep S/o Mukundi Kuldeep, aged about 64 years, R/o Pitiyajhar, Ward No. 12, Tahsil & District Mahasamund (C.G.). ---- Petitioner Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Atal

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

WP(S) No. 10827 of 2019

Jeevan Lal Kuldeep S/o Mukundi Kuldeep, aged about 64 years, R/o Pitiyajhar,Ward No. 12, Tahsil & District Mahasamund (C.G.).

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Public Works Department,Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.).Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.).

2. The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Raipur Division Raipur(C.G.).(C.G.).

3. The Executive Engineer (E & M), Light Machinery Nalkup and Gate Sub-Division No. 2, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.).Division No. 2, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.).

4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Light Machinery Nalkup and Gate SubDivision No. 2, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.).Division No. 2, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.).

5. The Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts and Pension, Raipur, DistrictRaipur (C.G.).Raipur (C.G.).

---- RespondentsFor Petitioner. :Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, AdvocateFor Respondents :Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice R.C.S. Samant

Order on Board

24/12/2019

1. Heard.

2. The instant petition has been filed for issuance of direction to theRespondents' Authority to consider the representation filed by thePetitioner for grant of full pension in light of the judgment passed inWrit Appeal No. 88/2019 (Mobin Khan v. State of Chhattisgarh &Others) on 01/04/2019. Respondents' Authority to consider the representation filed by thePetitioner for grant of full pension in light of the judgment passed inWrit Appeal No. 88/2019 (Mobin Khan v. State of Chhattisgarh &Others) on 01/04/2019.

Page 1 of 2

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the sameand submits that since the Petitioner is daily wager, therefore, he is notentitled to get full pension. and submits that since the Petitioner is daily wager, therefore, he is notentitled to get full pension.

4. Considering the submissions put-forth by the parties, the instantpetition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondents' Authority toconsider the representation already filed by the Petitioner in light of thejudgment mentioned here-in-above and pass an order in accordancewith law. petition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondents' Authority toconsider the representation already filed by the Petitioner in light of thejudgment mentioned here-in-above and pass an order in accordancewith law.

5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with the above direction.

Sd/-

(R.C.S. Samant)

Vacation Judge

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead