Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/42422/2022 of CHICHILI ANASUYA DEVI Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 30 December 2022
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No.42422 OF 2022 Between:- Chichili Anasuya Devi … Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION No.42422 OF 2022
Between:-
Chichili Anasuya Devi
and
… Petitioner
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District, and others … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : M/s. Nimmagadda Revathi Counsel for R.1 to R.5
: The G.P. for Revenue
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.
2. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition, in short, is that despite of the petitioner’s Meeseva application dated 09.6.2022 seeking deletion of his properties in survey Nos.246/2 and 247/2 admeasuring Ac.0.09 cents and Ac.0.17 cents respectively, of 102-E Ramireddypalli Revenue Village in Pulicherla Mandal of Chittoor District from the Prohibited Properties List under Section 22-A(1)(a) of the Registration, no action has been taken by the respondents so far.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, on the other hand, fairly submits that the application filed by the petitioner for deletion of the subject matter property is pending and if any time-limit is fixed, the concerned Authority i.e., the 2[nd] respondent considers the application and pass appropriate orders thereon.
4. In view of the above submission, without going into merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the 2[nd] respondent to consider the petitioner’s application dated 09.6.2022 for deletion of the subject matter property from the Prohibited Properties List and pass appropriate orders, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________
NINALA JAYASURYA, J December 30, 2022. ANI