Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/8077/2012 of P.Chitti Babu, Vs The Chief Executive Officer, on 31 December 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 8077 OF 2012 Between: 1. P Chitti Babu, s/o P.Hanumanth Rao, aged 31 years, Estate Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 8077 OF 2012

Between:

1. P Chitti Babu, s/o P.Hanumanth Rao, aged 31 years,Estate OfficerKedareswarapet, Vijayawada, R/o Kudapa Post, Reddygudem[mandal]Krishna District.Kedareswarapet, Vijayawada, R/o Kudapa Post, Reddygudem[mandal]Krishna District.

AND

...Petitioner

1. The Chi^ Executive Officer, Rythu Bazaar's Burugula[Ramakrishna]Bhavan, Hyderabad.Bhavan, Hyderabad.

2. The Joint Collector, Incharge, Rythu Bazaar, Krishna District.

3. The Tahsildar, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District.

As^stantDirector of Marketing,Gollapudi, VijayawadaRural,Krishna District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that inthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Courtmaybepleasedtoissueanappropriatewritororderordirectionmoreparticularly one in the nature of Writ Of Mandamus declaring the impugnedsuspensionorderpassedbythe2ndrespondentvideproceedingsNo.A/84/2012 dt.29.02.2012 as' illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, andcontrarytoG.O.Ms.No.29Agri.&Cooperative(AM.IV)Dept.dt.16.02.2012, and also violative of Articles 14, 21of the ConstitutionofIndia and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner inservice asa Estate Officer, Kedareswarapet, Vijayawada, Krishna District

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 10234 OF 7ni9|

Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitionthe High Court may bepleased to suspend the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondentvi^e proceedings No.A/84/2012 dt.29.02.2012, pending disposal of the WritPetition LA. NO: 2 OF 2012fWPMP. NO: 38971 DF

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesStated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitionthe High Court may bepleasedto EXTENDtheinterimorderdated27.03.2012passedinW.P.M.P.NO.10234 of 2012 in W.P.No.8077 of 2012

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI DR.J. VIJAYALAXMI

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR AGRICULTURE

The Court made the following: Order

APHC010451582012IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT AMARAVATI[3457](Special Original Jurisdiction)TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOURPRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.NWRIT PETITION NO: 8077/2012Between:P.chitti Babu...PETITIONERANDThe Chief Executive Officer and Others...RESPONDENT(S)Counsel for the Petitioner:1.DR.J. VIJAYALAXMICounsel for the Respondent(S):1.GP FOR AGRICULTUREThe Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order:-

There is no representation for the petitioner.

2. The petitioner is challenging the order of termination dated 29.02.2012.3.This Court vide order dated 27.03.2012 granted interim suspension ofthe impugned proceedings.4.There is no representation for the respondents and[no counter][ is][ filed.]4.Accordingly, this Writ Petitionis disposedoffin[terms]of theinterimorders granted by this Court. There shall be no order as[ to] costs.3.This Court vide order dated 27.03.2012 granted interim suspension ofthe impugned proceedings.4.There is no representation for the respondents and[no counter][ is][ filed.]4.Accordingly, this Writ Petitionis disposedoffin[terms]of theinterimorders granted by this Court. There shall be no order as[ to] costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,[shall][ stand][ closed.]

To,

//TRUE COPY//

Sd/- M SRINIVASASSISTANT REGISTRARSECTION OFFICER

1. The Chief Executive Officer, Rythu Bazaar’s Burugula Ramakrishnas Burugula RamakrishnaBhavan, Hyderabad.

2. The Joint Collector, Incharge, Rythu BazaarKrishna District.3. The Tahsildar, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District. The Tahsildar, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District. Tahsildar, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District. Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District. Rural, Krishna District. Krishna District. District.Sshn^a S.Vijayawada Rural3. The Tahsildar, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District. The Tahsildar, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District. Tahsildar, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District. Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District. Rural, Krishna District. Krishna District. District.Sshn^a S.Vijayawada Rural

3. The Tahsildar, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District. The Tahsildar, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District. Tahsildar, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District. Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District. Rural, Krishna District. Krishna District. District.

5. One CC to SRI DR.J. VIJAYALAXMI Advocate [OPUC]

6. Tworcs to GP FOR AGRICULTURE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh

7. Three CD Copies

HIGH COURT

DATED:31/12/2024

ORDER

WP.No.8077 of 2012

WRIT PETITION IS DISPOSED OFF

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead