Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/7866/2011 of DIPAK RAJAK Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH and ORS. on 21 December 2011
THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS / Dipak Rajak, son of Shri Hanuman Rajak, aged 38 years, Member, Block Kota, Zila Panchayat, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, resident of village Umarmara, Tehsll Kota, District Bilaspur (CG) Versus / 1. State of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
mngm gawk
IN THE HON’BLE[HIGH][ COURT][ OF][ JUDICATURE AT]
BILASPUR
Q
Noimqé[é]or 2011
Writ Petition @79)
/DipakRajak,sonofShriHanumanRajak,aged38Member,BlockKota,years,ZilaPanchayat,Bilaspur,DistrictBilaspur,residentofvillageUmarmara,TehsllKota,[District][ Bilaspur](CG)
PETITIONER:
Versus
RESPONDENTS
/1.
5f
StateofChhattisgarh,throughSecretary,DepartmentofRuralandUrbanAdministration,DKSBhawan,Mantralaya,Raipur(CG)
The Collector‘[Bilaspur](CG)
TheSubDivisionalOfficer,Kota, District[Bilaspur](CG)Tehsildar,Kota,DistrictBilaspur (CG)Kota, District[Bilaspur](CG)Tehsildar,Kota,DistrictBilaspur (CG)
NaibTehsildar,Ratanpur,District Bilaspur(CG)District Bilaspur(CG)
WRITPETITIONUNDERCONSTlTUTlON[OF]INDIA
ARTICLEZ’é‘h27OFTHE
W
mm..m:§Q{Qm¢&Zéé/E€H m[200]