Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/40687/2016 of A B RAM MOHAN REDDY, KADAPA DIST. Vs THE STATE OF A.P.,REVENUE,HYD.,AND 5 OTRS. on 30 December 2022
SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.40687 of 2016 ORDER: The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION No.40687 of 2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings LR.No.C1/1015/2016 dated 13.10.2016 issued by the 2[nd] respondent herein rejecting the complaint dated 08.07.2016 filed by the petitioner herein is being illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, violative of articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and opposed to the very sprit and object of the provisions contemplated under the Stamps and Registration Act and contrary to the Circular Memo No.61/1843/2015, dated 08.04.2015 and consequently to direct the 5[th] respondent herein not to release and register the document submitted by the 6[th] respondent in respect of Sy.No.941, 942, 943 and 944 of Rajampet Village, YSR Kadapa District.”
2. The petitioner filed complaint dated 08.07.2016 for cancelling the Registered partition deed No.624/2012 dated 13.02.2016 but the same was rejected by the proceedings in LR.No.C1/1015/2016 issued by the 2[nd] respondent. Aggrieved by the same, the present Writ Petition is filed.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material placed on record.
4. It is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel appearing for the 6[th] respondent that after filing of the Writ Petition, the document presented by the 6[th] respondent was already released. In view of the same, nothing survives for further adjudication in the matter.
5. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the 6[th]respondent, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no orders as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
_______________________
JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
Date : 30.12.2022 GSP/PSR
51
GSP/PSR
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
(Closed)
WRIT PETITION No.40687 of 2016
Date : 30.12.2022